GNU bug report logs - #35880
[PATCH 0/7] Lzip support for 'guix publish' and 'guix substitute'

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 13:34:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #88 received at 35880-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 35880-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#35880] [PATCH 1/7] lzlib: Add
 'make-lzip-input-port/compressed'.
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2019 08:02:29 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> I think the ‘lzread!’ loop should look like this (the tests still pass
> with this):
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>   (let loop ((read 0)
>              (start start))
>     (cond ((< read count)
>            (match (lz-decompress-read decoder bv start (- count read))
>              (0 (cond ((lz-decompress-finished? decoder)
>                        read)
>                       ((eof-object? (feed-decoder! decoder))
>                        (lz-decompress-finish decoder)
>                        (loop read start))
>                       (else                       ;read again
>                        (loop read start))))
>              (n (loop (+ read n) (+ start n)))))
>           (else
>            read)))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Looks good to me!

>>            (match (lz-decompress-read decoder bv start (- count read))
>>              (0 (if (eof-object? (feed-decoder! decoder))
>>                     read
>>                     (loop read start)))
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand the above: if we read nothing, then we try
>> again?
>
> No: if we read *something*, we try again; if we read nothing, we return.

If we read nothing _and_ it is not an EOF (it can be an empty vector),
then we loop indefinitely, no?

> Thanks for your careful review, much appreciated!

You are welcome, thanks for your invaluable work!

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 350 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.