GNU bug report logs -
#35690
Installer error: Unable to locate keymap update file
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 35690 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 35690 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35690
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 11 May 2019 22:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Lorem Ipsum <dolorsitatem <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 11 May 2019 22:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
Installation failed when i tried installing
guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso in Virtual Box 6.0.2 r128162 on
Windows 10.
The VM had 8192 Mb RAM, 64 Gb harddrive and 2 CPUs. Everything else was
default.
During the install I had selected
- language for installation: English
- territory: United states
- Graphical install using a terminal based interface
- timezone: America
- timezone: Detroit
- keyboard layout: English (US)
- variant: English (intl., with AltGr dead keys)
Here are pictures of the traceback:
[image: image.png]
[image: image.png]
I had used these same options, to my knowledge, in a previous install which
completed successfully.
Thank you for Guix and please let me know if there is more I can do to
help.
Thanks,
Matt
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[image.png (image/png, inline)]
[image.png (image/png, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35690
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 12 May 2019 07:04:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 35690 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 06:21:37PM -0400, Lorem Ipsum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Installation failed when i tried installing
> guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso in Virtual Box 6.0.2 r128162 on
> Windows 10.
>
Could it be that at first, the install failed (e.g. because of a
network error that sometimes happened before it was fixed in current
unreleased Guix) and then you chose to retry the installer? If this
is what you did, the option to retry should probably be removed; I
think Mathieu said unmounting and remounting was not working anyway.
If this is not what you did, then this is a new bug.
Regards,
Florian
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35690
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 12 May 2019 11:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 35690 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ave Lorem Ipsum,
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de> writes:
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 06:21:37PM -0400, Lorem Ipsum wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Installation failed when i tried installing
>> guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso in Virtual Box 6.0.2 r128162 on
>> Windows 10.
>>
>
> Could it be that at first, the install failed (e.g. because of a
> network error that sometimes happened before it was fixed in current
> unreleased Guix) and then you chose to retry the installer?
please also confirm you have verified the authenticity of the image as
shown in
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/USB-Stick-and-DVD-Installation.html
also please show the sha512 checksum of the uncompressed iso image, if
you can
it (rarely) happens that the downloaded image gets corrupted somewhere
in the process
[...]
Gratias tibi ago! Gio'
--
Giovanni Biscuolo
Xelera IT Infrastructures
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35690
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 13 May 2019 18:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 35690 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
If I read the gpg output correctly, then it downloaded okay. My experience
with gpg is limited, so here is the exact output of --verify:
mintty screen dump
$ gpg --verify guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso.xz.sig
gpg: assuming signed data in
'guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso.xz' gpg: Signature made
Wed, May 1, 2019 4:12:23 PM EDT gpg:
using RSA key 3CE464558A84FDC69DB40CFB090B11993D9AEBB5
gpg: Good signature from "Ludovic Courtès " [unknown] gpg:
aka "Ludovic Courtès " [unknown] gpg:
aka "Ludovic Courtès (Inria) " [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This
key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg:
There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A
EBB5
The SHA512 I generated was:
mintty screen dump
$ sha512sum guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso
5b295c0db41c8ea896fc7eb693d25c311d473cbcc0ee95b959b2b63a8026a604f19d2f3299b1dc1451fc99459639a2f8d340204a5946bc5f921a402bf11bb8e3
*guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso
Regarding the "retry" option in the installer, I can't say whether or not I
used it. I attempted several times with various configurations and don't
recall the specific one which produced the output I gave you.
Anecdotally, I can say that "Unable to locate keymap" error occurred
whenever MATE was selected for my DE. I was able to complete the install
without a problem for GNOME, Enlightenment, and OpenBox.
Thank you for assisting me,
Matt
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 7:17 AM Giovanni Biscuolo <g <at> xelera.eu> wrote:
> Ave Lorem Ipsum,
>
> "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de> writes:
>
> > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 06:21:37PM -0400, Lorem Ipsum wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Installation failed when i tried installing
> >> guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso in Virtual Box 6.0.2 r128162
> on
> >> Windows 10.
> >>
> >
> > Could it be that at first, the install failed (e.g. because of a
> > network error that sometimes happened before it was fixed in current
> > unreleased Guix) and then you chose to retry the installer?
>
> please also confirm you have verified the authenticity of the image as
> shown in
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/USB-Stick-and-DVD-Installation.html
>
> also please show the sha512 checksum of the uncompressed iso image, if
> you can
>
> it (rarely) happens that the downloaded image gets corrupted somewhere
> in the process
>
> [...]
>
> Gratias tibi ago! Gio'
>
> --
> Giovanni Biscuolo
>
> Xelera IT Infrastructures
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
Request was from
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 15 May 2019 11:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Merged 35690 35700.
Request was from
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 15 May 2019 11:54:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35690
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 15 May 2019 17:20:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #21 received at 35690 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Ave Matt,
Lorem Ipsum <dolorsitatem <at> gmail.com> writes:
[...]
> $ gpg --verify guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso.xz.sig
> gpg: assuming signed data in
> 'guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso.xz' gpg: Signature made
> Wed, May 1, 2019 4:12:23 PM EDT gpg:
> using RSA key 3CE464558A84FDC69DB40CFB090B11993D9AEBB5
> gpg: Good signature from "Ludovic Courtès " [unknown] gpg:
OK, good signature
[...]
> $ sha512sum guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso
> 5b295c0db41c8ea896fc7eb693d25c311d473cbcc0ee95b959b2b63a8026a604f19d2f3299b1dc1451fc99459639a2f8d340204a5946bc5f921a402bf11bb8e3
> *guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso
this is also what I get:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ sha512sum guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso
5b295c0db41c8ea896fc7eb693d25c311d473cbcc0ee95b959b2b63a8026a604f19d2f3299b1dc1451fc99459639a2f8d340204a5946bc5f921a402bf11bb8e3 guix-system-install-1.0.0.x86_64-linux.iso
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> Regarding the "retry" option in the installer, I can't say whether or not I
> used it. I attempted several times with various configurations and don't
> recall the specific one which produced the output I gave you.
you can see this bug has been merged with #35700 that in turn is related
to #35543: "Installer cannot be restarted after a failed install"
are you able to reproduce this bug when _not_ restarting the installer?
> Anecdotally, I can say that "Unable to locate keymap" error occurred
> whenever MATE was selected for my DE.
can you please try to reproduce this bug and file a new one if this
happens?
[...]
--
Giovanni Biscuolo
Xelera IT Infrastructures
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent
to
Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Lorem Ipsum <dolorsitatem <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 35690-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
This has been fixed by 64704be417ab6f2788e8e3bc36fede1db35470e7.
Thanks,
Mathieu
Reply sent
to
Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Mortimer Cladwell <mbcladwell <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:05:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 60 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.