GNU bug report logs - #35247
[PATCH] Add alacritty to terminal list supporting colors

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: doron.behar <at> gmail.com

Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 20:13:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eike Gebauer <eike <at> zettelkiste.de>
To: 35247 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#35247: [PATCH] Add alacritty to terminal list supporting colors
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 14:31:06 +0200
I am not trying to spam this mailing list, but I received several DMARC 
reports after sending the previous mail (never happened to me before, no 
idea why).
So I am trying again from a different domain, in case the email wasn't 
received at all.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Regards
Eike Gebauer

On 28/03/2024 17:58, Eike Gebauer wrote:
> By now alacritty has been packaged for Fedora for quite a while 
> (https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/rust-alacritty/alacritty/) 
> and is used by a relatively large community (>50k Stars on Github).
>
> The corresponding issue on the alacritty side has sadly been closed as 
> "wontfix" (https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/issues/2210), so I 
> would like to ask you to add `TERM alacritty` to dircolors.hin 
> instead, as originally requested by Doron Behar.
>
> Regards,
>
> Eike
>
> PS
> I did not find a way to reply to the old thread from the mailing list 
> archive with the correct `In-Reply-To` header, so this might not be 
> threaded correctly with the original messages from 2019.
>
> On Sat, 11 May 2019 16:57:40 +0300, Doron Behar wrote:
> > Well I'm not a developer of alacritty, just a humble user. I had only
> > taken the effort to investigate why I dircolors wouldn't define colors
> > for me when in this terminal.
> >
> > Under it's installation section of the README, listed the supported
> > packages for the various distros:
> >
> > https://github.com/jwilm/alacritty#installation
> >
> > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 08:24:09AM -0700, Pádraig Brady wrote:On 
> 28/03/2024 17:34, bug-coreutils-request <at> gnu.org wrote:
> > > On 12/04/19 12:20, address <at> hidden wrote:
> > > > From: Doron Behar <address <at> hidden>
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/jwilm/alacritty
> > > > ---
> > > >  src/dircolors.hin | 1 +
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/src/dircolors.hin b/src/dircolors.hin
> > > > index 3aa445bfa..424ed5b19 100644
> > > > --- a/src/dircolors.hin
> > > > +++ b/src/dircolors.hin
> > > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > > >  # against the TERM environment variable to determine if it is 
> colorizable.
> > > >  TERM Eterm
> > > >  TERM ansi
> > > > +TERM alacritty
> > > >  TERM *color*
> > > >  TERM con[0-9]*x[0-9]*
> > > >  TERM cons25
> > > >
> > >
> > > I don't see this terminal packaged for Feodra at least.
> > > Why does it need its own TERM ?
> > > If it does, could one add 'color' to get the existing matching?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Pádraig
>
>
>
>




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 66 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.