GNU bug report logs - #34865
[PATCH] Add emacs-zones.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#34865: closed ([PATCH] Add emacs-zones.)
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:28:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Wed, 27 Mar 2019 22:27:39 +0300
with message-id <87y350ruc4.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [bug#34865] [PATCH] Add emacs-zones.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #34865,
regarding [PATCH] Add emacs-zones.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
34865: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34865
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Add emacs-zones.
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 01:24:08 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

See attached.

[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]

[0001-gnu-Add-emacs-zones.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>
To: 34865-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com>,
 Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [bug#34865] [PATCH] Add emacs-zones.
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 22:27:39 +0300

[Message part 7 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

[…]

>>>>>> Could we use emacs-zones from Elpa? See
>>>>>> https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/zones.html . ‘guix import elpa
>>>>>> emacs-zones’ will produce a decent ‘origin’ record to pull a source.
>>>>>
>>>>> My understanding is that ELPA and MELPA tarballs are not necessarily
>>>>> persistent and immutable, and that we generally prefer referring
>>>>> directly to the upstream repo.
>>>>
>>>> Ouch, I thought ELPA is persistent.  That's a significant argument to
>>>> not use ELPA for our purposes :-( .
>>
>> I only know that MELPA isn’t immutable.  I assumed that ELPA is fine.
>
> [...]
>
>> git-fetch is the preferred way when there are no stable tarballs.
>
> So, Oleg, I think you can go either way, but fetching over Git is
> probably safer.
>
> Can you apply the patch?

OK, pushed as c881ed8698517a2c2007c2fdc3a7aeec52ff109c with a source
fetching over Git.

Thanks,
Oleg.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.