GNU bug report logs -
#34323
reproducibility: absolute file names in ox-odt.elc
Previous Next
Reported by: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 23:06:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Found in version 26.1.91
Done: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2019 12:33:30 +0100
with message-id <87wom9ci2d.fsf <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
and subject line Re: bug#34323: reproducibility: absolute file names in ox-odt.elc
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #34323,
regarding reproducibility: absolute file names in ox-odt.elc
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
34323: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34323
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Package: emacs,org-mode
Version: 26.1.91
Severity: minor
The compiled file ox-odt.elc contains strings that refer to the
absolute location of the build directory, through
org-odt-schema-dir-list and org-odt-styles-dir-list.
For example, in the Emacs 26.1.91 pretest tarfile, it contains
"/home/nico/work/emacs-26/etc/schema/" and
"/home/nico/work/emacs-26/etc/styles/".
This means the generated elc file is non-reproducible (ie, the contents
change depending on the build directory).
(Like https://debbugs.gnu.org/34321, issued spotted in
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/diffoscope-results/emacs.html
)
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello,
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> writes:
> It's due to the eval-when-compile sections in org-odt-schema-dir-list
> and org-odt-styles-dir-list. These don't make sense to me. All they do
> is add the build directory. There is a comment "see make install", but I
> cannot see what this refers to. No similar variable initializes itself
> in this way AFAIK. If those sections are removed, does anything stop
> working?
I don't know. I removed `the `eval-when-compile' calls. We'll see what
horrible things happen.
I'm closing this bug for now. Thank you for reporting it.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 138 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.