GNU bug report logs - #33567
Syntactic fontification of diff hunks

Previous Next

Full log

Message #154 received at 33567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: 33567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#33567: Syntactic fontification of diff hunks
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 03:40:46 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 25.12.2018 22:39, Juri Linkov wrote:
>> Your proposed new colors for added/removed are the same that are used
>> GitHub/GitLab, so this should be a good change.  For refine-removed
>> better to use GitLab's color #ffcccc that is very close to the
>> color you proposed.  But for refine-added GitLab made the same mistake
>> that GitHub already fixed.  So the best color for refine-added is #bbffbb.
> 
> After trying to use there colors, I see that their shade is too subtle.
> They might look better on large hunks, and I'm not sure why they look ok
> in the browser, but in Emacs refined colors for small changes are almost
> not noticeable.  However, please change them if majority agrees.

To my eyes, that's a surprising conclusion.

I wasn't going to argue with your correction to refine-added, even 
though I might prefer a slightly lighter variation (because I end up 
looking at larger refined regions often). Are you now saying that 
#ffcccc for refine-removed (or #d0ffd0, the difference is visible only 
on large regions) and #bbffbb for refine-added are hard for you to 
notice on smaller regions?

It most likely depends on the choice of the font, the contrast levels of 
the monitor and similar stuff, but during the same several days I have 
not met the same experience.

Before we get into deeper discussion (as well as discussing how one 
finds out majority's opinion), I have to ask: did you make sure to use 
the new refined colors with the new diff-added and diff-removed 
background colors?

Attached are the screenshots of the default theme with my preferred font 
(Inconsolata LGC) and refined colors from your counter-proposal. The 
default Ubuntu's monospaced font is even more prominent and arguably 
readable, I can make screenshots with it as well if you like.

This is commit a94ac604d8. We can also note that GitHub only refines 
smaller chunks: 
https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/commit/a94ac604d8c9848b0414ade80a1920b345161656, 
so its use of darker backgrounds is more justifiable.

What do you think of the screenshots? Are the small refined regions hard 
for you to see? Or do they look very different in your Emacs?

[Screenshot from 2018-12-26 03-28-06.png (image/png, attachment)]

[Screenshot from 2018-12-26 03-28-44.png (image/png, attachment)]

[Screenshot from 2018-12-26 03-29-20.png (image/png, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.