GNU bug report logs -
#335
bug tracking system leads to duplicate replies appearing
Previous Next
Reported by: Joe Wells <jbw <at> macs.hw.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 22:40:05 UTC
Severity: normal
Merged with 392,
897
Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #27 received at 335 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Joe Wells wrote:
> Even if this is so for one mailing list, it might not be the case
> for other mailing lists. So people can not in general rely on the
> behavior of any “reply” function of their mail program to reach the
> right people.
That's why you use reply-to-list, which obeys Mail-Followup-To: which
people can easily use to indicate that they should be Cc:'ed or not.
reply-to-all is a ugly work-around for bad MUAs and people who don't
know any better. [It leads to duplicate messages...]
> In this case, a good solution is that the bug tracking software
> could make sure to always omit bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org from the list
> of recipients whenever XYZ <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com is going to be
> one of the recipients.
That would require prescience, which isn't going to happen. To:
message headers don't necessarily indicate who actually received a
message.
> I notice that you just now have started adding a Mail-Followup-To
> header.
I always add MFT if I want a copy, and don't when I don't.
> This is a good idea. I notice that don <at> donarmstrong.com is not in
> the Mail-Followup-To header. I'm curious, how does your software
> know to omit this address?
It doesn't. I put it in when I need it.
Don Armstrong
--
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
-- Robert Heinlein
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
This bug report was last modified 15 years and 122 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.