GNU bug report logs -
#32300
Cuirass: the 'nr' filter doesn't work when builds have multiple outputs
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 16 Aug 2018 22:59:39 +0200
with message-id <87zhxm3u4k.fsf <at> lassieur.org>
and subject line Re: bug#32300: [PATCH] database: Fix the builds limit issue.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #32300,
regarding Cuirass: the 'nr' filter doesn't work when builds have multiple outputs
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
32300: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32300
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
With, say, 'nr' = 4, the GROUP-OUTPUTS procedure in cuirass/database.scm
will transform
0 | out | /gnu/store/...
1 | out | /gnu/store/...
1 | debug | /gnu/store/...
2 | out | /gnu/store/...
into
((#:id . 0) (#:outputs ("out" (#:path . "/gnu/store/..."))))
((#:id . 1) (#:outputs ("out" (#:path . "/gnu/store/..."))
("debug" (#:path . "/gnu/store/..."))))
((#:id . 2) (#:outputs ("out" (#:path . "/gnu/store/..."))))
Thus there are only 3 elements returned by the low-level DB-GET-BUILDS
procedure, while we expect 4.
This bug is visible through the API (latestbuilds, queue) and the web
interface (eval) because they use that DB-GET-BUILDS procedure.
Clément
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 04 Aug 2018 18:10:51 +0200
> Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> wrote:
>
>> Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> writes:
>>
>> > Fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/32300>.
>> >
>> > * src/cuirass/database.scm (filters->order): New procedure.
>> > (db-get-builds): Remove FORMAT-OUTPUT, CONS-OUTPUT, COLLECT-OUTPUTS,
>> > FINISH-GROUP, SAME-GROUP?, GROUP-OUTPUTS procedures. Remove the 'LEFT JOIN
>> > Outputs' clause. Use DB-GET-OUTPUTS for each build that was fetched.
>>
>> This may be less efficient because there are more SQL queries (one per
>> output), but it's way less complicated and less buggy, so I think it's
>> worth it.
>
> Yeah, if it's still usable, I agree.
>
> But I think we shouldn't overlook the possibility of not fetching the outputs
> in the first place (at all).
Pushed. Thank you for the review!
Clément
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 282 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.