GNU bug report logs - #32022
(new feature) Change guix pull to choose commits for which substitutes is already built by default

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Alex Sassmannshausen <alex <at> pompo.co>
Cc: 26608 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen <at> fastmail.net>, 22629 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 32022 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#32022: bug#22629: “Stable” branch
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:22:35 +0200

Hi Alex,

Alex Sassmannshausen <alex <at> pompo.co> skribis:

> So the example you provided is a user-defined policy to install the
> latest version of Guix that is downloadable using substitutes (if guix
> publish has published those already).
>
> As you say, in a similar vein, the end user could for themselves define
> a policy that searches for a commit containing a specific successful
> build, or a set of specific successful builds.

Exactly.

>> As I imagine it, the cost would be a few HTTP queries to the Cuirass
>> API.  I should try to come up with an example to better explain what I
>> had in mind!
>
> Your example helps visualize this, thanks.
>
> Your example depends on there being a jobset that comprises the set of
> packages you are interested in testing.

Yes, and it’s hacky in that the substitute server and jobset names are
hard-coded, but you get the idea.

> I imagine it is possible to do the same for an individual package / job.

Yes.

> The situation would be different if the end user wanted to perform a
> similar operation for an arbitrary set of packages on their end.

It would be quite similar: you would query the set of builds of an
evaluation of the “guix-modular” jobset and check whether the packages
of interest were built.

>> What I typically do is “guix pull && guix package -n -u”.  Then I look
>> at things that would be built; if, say, LibreOffice is among them, I
>> wait for a little while and try again later, until I can get enough
>> substitutes.  That usually works okay, but it fails if it turns out that
>> one of the dependencies fails to build: substitutes never become
>> available in that case.
>
> Interesting.  Do you think this kind of thing might be useful to have in
> the Guix manual? Like, in a section about a "typical" desktop end-user
> might manage their system day to day?

It would make sense to have such a section I guess.  However, before
teaching users how to work around deficiencies of our infrastructure our
processes ;-), I’d like us to improve them much as possible.  I’m sure
we have room for improvement for instance in Cuirass.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.