GNU bug report logs - #31707
[PATCH 1/1] ido: add ido-fallback special variable

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Christophe Junke <junke.christophe <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 09:01:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed, patch

Merged with 31783

Fixed in version 26.2

Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #16 received at 31707 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: junke.christophe <at> gmail.com, 31707 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#31707: [PATCH 1/1] ido: add ido-fallback special variable
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 17:54:33 +0300
> From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: junke.christophe <at> gmail.com,  31707 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:52:29 -0400
> 
> >> > What new feature is being introduced there?  I couldn't see anything
> >> > new, just fixing a breakage.
> >> 
> >> The optional parameter to ido-fallback-command is new.
> >> 
> >> The ido-fallback is sort of a new variable, although it's arguably just
> >> a proper prefixing of the old `fallback' one.
> >
> > Maybe I'm confused about which patch will eventually go in.  Can you
> > show it?
> 
> The one in https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=31707#5.

So I wasn't confused, thanks.

> Depending how strict we want to be about changes, we could split off the
> ido-fallback-command parameter addition from the ido-fallback variable.

No, I don't think this would be necessary.  We are adding a variable
to fix breakage.  I think this can go to emacs-26 as-is.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 4 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.