GNU bug report logs - #31628
26.1; Problem in read-multiple-choice's docstring

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Damien Cassou <damien <at> cassou.me>

Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 15:24:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: fixed

Found in version 26.1

Fixed in version 26.2

Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #24 received at 31628 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: Damien Cassou <damien <at> cassou.me>, 31628 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#31628: 26.1; Problem in read-multiple-choice's docstring
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 17:39:43 +0100
Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:

>> Technically, a list of (A B C) is as much an alist as a list of (A . B),
>> but I agree that the docstring can be clarified a bit.
>
> No - assuming you mean that A, B, and C are elements of the
> list and they are atoms, not cons cells.

You misunderstood the wording that Damien and I used.  We both referred
to lists *of elements* (A B C), not lists *of form* (A B C).  In other
words, (A B C) and (A . B) describe the structure of the list's
elements, not that of the list itself.

The preposition "of" in "list of (A B C)" totally disambiguates this
distinction for me; if the wording is not as clear to others, then
perhaps someone will suggest an improvement.

-- 
Basil




This bug report was last modified 6 years and 358 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.