GNU bug report logs - #31176
[PATCH] gnu: Add inxi.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:24:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Merged with 31178

Done: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Pierre Neidhardt <ambrevar <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>, 31178 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 31176 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#31176] [bug#31178] [PATCH] gnu: Add inxi.
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 23:27:08 +0200
Oleg, could you take care of this patch?  (See Pierre’s comments below.)

Pierre Neidhardt <ambrevar <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> I didn't know Oleg was going to submit a patch, maybe there was some
>>> confusion in the process :p
>>
>> I've mentioned it in our mailing list discussion, see
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2018-04/msg00130.html
>
> Sorry, I had completely missed the last line :)
>
>> If you are talking about 31176, then no, because I've used a wrapper to
>> find all ‘inxi-minimal’ or ‘inxi’ requisites.  It was easy to do,
>> because ‘inxi’ in 31176 is a Shell script, not a Perl script.  Thanks to
>> Chris Marusich for an idea.
>
> I think we can do the same thing for the Perl version.  You want to give
> it a try?
>
> If I understand correctly, relying on native-inputs would mean that if the user
> runs `guix gc`, then all of inxi "optional" dependencies would go.
> Is this correct?




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 20 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.