GNU bug report logs - #30375
just a boring documentation license violation

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#30375: closed (just a boring documentation license violation)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:03:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:02:09 -0700
with message-id <CAHN-Gmwps9+jotXheewV5E1gVpE=v-Rgm-rNr_Pj7FsDAA1urg <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#30375: just a boring documentation license violation
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #30375,
regarding just a boring documentation license violation
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
30375: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30375
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Nathan Schuetz <nathan.schuetz <at> arterys.com>
To: bug-sed <at> gnu.org
Subject: just a boring documentation license violation
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:24:25 -0700

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

I have a very boring thing to report: there is a site posting the
documentation for sed without including the license.

https://www.computerhope.com/unix/used.htm

No need to reply, just passing the information along since you might know
who to tell it to.

Best,
Nathan

[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com>
To: Nathan Schuetz <nathan.schuetz <at> arterys.com>
Cc: 30375-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#30375: just a boring documentation license violation
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:02:09 -0700

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Nathan Schuetz <nathan.schuetz <at> arterys.com>
wrote:

> I have a very boring thing to report: there is a site posting the
> documentation for sed without including the license.
>
> https://www.computerhope.com/unix/used.htm


Thank you for reporting this issue.
I will forward it to the licensing people at FSF.

strangely,
they updated/generated the page very recently, but used quite an old
version of the manual.
They also claim copyright to material published on their website, and that
is clearly not valid for sed's manual.

As this is not a bug, I'm marking this as done, but discussion can continue
by replying to this thread.

regards,
 - assaf

[Message part 7 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.