GNU bug report logs - #30328
[PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-browse-at-remote-gnu.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #20 received at 30328 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 30328 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30328] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-browse-at-remote-gnu.
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 22:41:53 +0100

Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>   >>   > What about simply adding the patch to ‘emacs-browse-at-remote’ if
>   >>   > it’s committed upstream way?
>   >>
>   >> I'm sorry, what do you mean by “committed upstream way”?
>   >
>   > I mean that the patch for Savannah support is already in the repository
>   > of ‘browse-at-remote’, isn’t it?
>
> Technically it is there.

Good.

>   > Which is to say that the next version of ‘browse-at-remote’ will
>   > have that functionality.
>   >
>   > I don’t know, won’t the next ‘browse-at-remote’ include it?
>
> I hope so, but I cannot answer for them (upstream).

Well if it’s already in their repo, let’s assume it’ll be in the next
version.

>   > The output of ‘guix lint’ seems to be messy, too.
>
> Do you mean “filled”?  Sorry for that.

Several lines appear to overlap.

> So, what will our strategy be?  Stay close to upstream by making a new
> package with patch or patching the original package?

Patch the ‘emacs-browse-at-remote’ package, I’d say.

Sounds good?

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.