GNU bug report logs - #30176
readlinkat and _FORTIFY_SOURCE on Cygwin

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>

Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 20:47:01 UTC

Severity: important

Done: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
Subject: bug#30176: closed (Re: bug#30176: readlinkat and _FORTIFY_SOURCE
 on Cygwin)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 12:31:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#30176: readlinkat and _FORTIFY_SOURCE on Cygwin

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 30176 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
30176: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30176
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>, 30176-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#30176: readlinkat and _FORTIFY_SOURCE on Cygwin
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 07:30:26 -0500
On 1/19/2018 6:25 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> 4. Fix Cygwin readlinkat so that it can be used as a function pointer 
> even when _FORTIFY_SOURCE is used.
> 
> Why not do what glibc does with readlinkat? It fortifies readlinkat, and 
> doesn't run into this problem.

Sorry, that was stupid of me.  I don't know why I was thinking that this 
was an Emacs issue.

Ken

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: readlinkat and _FORTIFY_SOURCE on Cygwin
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:46:39 -0500
The next release of Cygwin (2.10.0), expected within the next few weeks, 
is going to have a new implementation of _FORTIFY_SOURCE guards for many 
functions, including readlinkat.  The implementation is based on that of 
NetBSD and has the effect of adding code that looks essentially as 
follows after preprocessing:

ssize_t
__ssp_real_readlinkat (int __dirfd1, const char *__path,
                       char *__buf, size_t __len)
  __asm__("readlinkat");

extern __inline__ __attribute__((__always_inline__, __gnu_inline__))
ssize_t
readlinkat (int __dirfd1, const char *__path, char *__buf,
            size_t __len)
  __asm__("__ssp_protected_readlinkat");

extern __inline__ __attribute__((__always_inline__, __gnu_inline__))
ssize_t
readlinkat (int __dirfd1, const char *__path, char *__buf,
            size_t __len)
{
  if (__builtin_object_size(__buf, 2 > 1) != (size_t)-1
      && __len > __builtin_object_size(__buf, 2 > 1))
    __chk_fail();
  return __ssp_real_readlinkat (__dirfd1, __path, __buf, __len);
}

The occurrence of this code in fileio.c, combined with the use of a 
pointer to readlinkat in the definition of emacs_readlinkat, leads to an 
"undefined reference to `__ssp_protected_readlinkat'" linking error.

I'd appreciate some advice on how to fix this.  I can think of three 
possibilities, but maybe there's something better:

1. Add "#define _FORTIFY_SOURCE 0' at the top of fileio.c (Cygwin only).

2. Pretend like Cygwin doesn't have readlinkat.  Then gnulib will create 
its own definition, which will be found by the linker in libegnu.a.

3. Ask gnulib to come up with a fix.

Thanks in advance for any advice.

Ken



This bug report was last modified 7 years and 127 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.