GNU bug report logs - #29220
26.0.90; eieio-persistent-read fail to restore saved object.

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: pierre.techoueyres <at> free.fr (Pierre Téchoueyres)

Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 22:20:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 33441

Found in version 26.0.90

Full log


Message #183 received at 29220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: pierre.techoueyres <at> free.fr (Pierre Téchoueyres)
To: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
Cc: jwiegley <at> gmail.com, 29220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
 Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#29220: 26.0.90;
 eieio-persistent-read fail to restore saved object.
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 01:34:44 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> On 02/25/18 00:21 AM, Pierre Téchoueyres wrote:
>> Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>>
>>> pierre.techoueyres <at> free.fr (Pierre Téchoueyres) writes:
>>>
>>>> Hello Eric,
>>>> Any news on this fix ?
>>>
>>> Hey, sorry again this is taking so long. I wanted to run CEDET's test
>>> suite, as that seems to be the main library that relies on
>>> eieio-persistent, and I wanted to make sure it passed with these
>>> changes. I can't get CEDET to build on my machine, however (apparently
>>> Arch has a too-new version of ImageMagick, and CEDET won't build against
>>> it), and I haven't had any luck just faking it and running the tests
>>> themselves -- everything's too dependent on a successful build.
>>>
>>> I've only got two Arch machines to play with -- if anyone could
>>> successfully build and test CEDET using the fix/eieio-persistent branch,
>>> that would be very helpful...
>>>
>>
>> I've been able to run the "itest-batch" and "utest-batch" from the CEDET
>> git repository (http://git.code.sf.net/p/cedet/git), but I don't know
>> how to interpret the results. Whatever the emacs version I use (25.3 or
>> 26.0.91 + fix), I get errors. So I don't know what to check for the
>> fix/eieio-persistent branch.
>
> Bah, this is annoyingly difficult -- thank you for trying it out. I
> suppose one terrible heuristic would be if the errors were different
> between emacs-25, emacs-26, and fix/eieio-persistent. Would you mind
> sending me the error output, in case anything jumps out at me?
>
Hope this could help you.

[itest-batch-25.3.log.xz (application/x-xz, attachment)]
[utest-batch-25.3.log.xz (application/x-xz, attachment)]
[itest-batch-26-eieio.log.xz (application/x-xz, attachment)]
[utest-batch-26-eieio.log.xz (application/x-xz, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 6 years and 15 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.