GNU bug report logs - #29220
26.0.90; eieio-persistent-read fail to restore saved object.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #177 received at 29220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: pierre.techoueyres <at> free.fr (Pierre Téchoueyres)
To: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
Cc: jwiegley <at> gmail.com, 29220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
 Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: bug#29220: 26.0.90;
 eieio-persistent-read fail to restore saved object.
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 00:21:28 +0100

Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> pierre.techoueyres <at> free.fr (Pierre Téchoueyres) writes:
>
>> Hello Eric,
>> Any news on this fix ?
>
> Hey, sorry again this is taking so long. I wanted to run CEDET's test
> suite, as that seems to be the main library that relies on
> eieio-persistent, and I wanted to make sure it passed with these
> changes. I can't get CEDET to build on my machine, however (apparently
> Arch has a too-new version of ImageMagick, and CEDET won't build against
> it), and I haven't had any luck just faking it and running the tests
> themselves -- everything's too dependent on a successful build.
>
> I've only got two Arch machines to play with -- if anyone could
> successfully build and test CEDET using the fix/eieio-persistent branch,
> that would be very helpful...
>

I've been able to run the "itest-batch" and "utest-batch" from the CEDET
git repository (http://git.code.sf.net/p/cedet/git), but I don't know
how to interpret the results. Whatever the emacs version I use (25.3 or
26.0.91 + fix), I get errors. So I don't know what to check for the
fix/eieio-persistent branch.

> Eric
Pierre

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.