GNU bug report logs - #28063
Guix manual refers to wrong binary tarball

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>

Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 12:32:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 28355

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 28063 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 28063 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#28063; Package guix. (Sat, 12 Aug 2017 12:32:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 12 Aug 2017 12:32:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Guix manual refers to wrong binary tarball
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:31:32 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello!

I tried installing Guix on a foreign distribution yesterday, and
copy-pasted the commands listed here:

https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/guix.html#Binary-Installation

However, the tarball name it refers to does not exist. I had to manually
s/0.13.0.314-a8d0c/0.13.0/ to make the commands work.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Merged 28063 28355. Request was from ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 05 Sep 2017 13:00:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Reply sent to ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès):
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 05 Sep 2017 13:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 05 Sep 2017 13:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #12 received at 28063-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>, Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft <at> uq.edu.au>
Cc: 28063-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#28063: Guix manual refers to wrong binary tarball
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:02:19 +0200
Heya,

Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> skribis:

> I tried installing Guix on a foreign distribution yesterday, and
> copy-pasted the commands listed here:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/guix.html#Binary-Installation
>
> However, the tarball name it refers to does not exist. I had to manually
> s/0.13.0.314-a8d0c/0.13.0/ to make the commands work.

This is now fixed.  Thanks!

Ludo’.




Reply sent to ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès):
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 05 Sep 2017 13:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft <at> uq.edu.au>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 05 Sep 2017 13:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 04 Oct 2017 11:24:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 7 years and 255 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.