GNU bug report logs -
#27344
[PATCH 0/12] Add computational software and circuit simulators
Previous Next
Full log
Message #316 received at 27344-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Theodoros,
Theodoros Foradis <theodoros <at> foradis.org> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Theodoros Foradis <theodoros <at> foradis.org> skribis:
>>
>>> * gnu/packages/engineering.scm (qucs-s): New variable.
>>
>> There seems to be a lot of duplication with ‘qucs’. Would it be
>> possible to inherit from qucs, thereby reusing its phases, and simply
>> provide any extra phase that’s needed?
>
> Some paths are different in those two packages. For example:
> Qucs:
>> (substitute* '("qucs/qucs/qucsdigi"
>> "qucs/qucs/qucsdigilib"
>> "qucs/qucs/qucsveri")
>
>> (wrap-program (string-append out "/bin/qucs")
>
> Qucs-s:
>> (substitute* '("qucs/qucsdigi"
>> "qucs/qucsdigilib"
>> "qucs/qucsveri")
>
>> (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
>> (file (string-append out "/bin/qucs-s"))
>> (qucs (assoc-ref inputs "qucs"))
>> (qucsator (string-append qucs "/bin/qucsator")))
>> (wrap-program file
>
> So qucs-s cannot inherit qucs, and this is why I dismissed that when I
> looked at it in the past.
>
> I think we could create a procedure, that takes the variables as
> arguments and returns a qucs package. So that qucs-s inherits the
> application of that procedure on different arguments.
>
> Is this preferable to having two different packages with some identical
> phases?
Well you’re right, there’s no great solution in this case.
Finally pushed as commit ef2c6b409568123e760a7dfa22d45fc09e713198.
We’re done! :-)
Thank you!
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 195 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.