GNU bug report logs - #26985
Seeming regressions in Guile 2.2 relative to Guile 2.0

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric <at> chemoelectric.org>

Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 18:56:01 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 26985 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#26985; Package guile. (Thu, 18 May 2017 18:56:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric <at> chemoelectric.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guile <at> gnu.org. (Thu, 18 May 2017 18:56:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric <at> chemoelectric.org>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: Seeming regressions in Guile 2.2 relative to Guile 2.0
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 13:19:07 -0500

I do not have time or resources to do it myself, or even to make a
real bug report, but those interested in improving Guile 2.2 might
want to figure out why it cannot compile
https://bitbucket.org/sortsmill/sortsmill-core-guile. Guile 2.0 has no
trouble.

(One needs https://bitbucket.org/sortsmill/sortsmill-core to build
it.)

(Core Guile also presents an example of automatically compiling Guile
sources in dependency order, in case one is interested in that.)
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 27 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.