GNU bug report logs - #26840
[PATCH 2/3] gnu: go-1.4: Add missing module imports.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox <at> inbox.ru>

Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 19:57:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Kei Kebreau <kei <at> openmailbox.org>
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox <at> inbox.ru>, 26840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#26840: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: go-1.4: Add missing module imports.
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 19:05:22 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Hi Kei,
>
> Kei Kebreau <kei <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:
>
>> Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox <at> inbox.ru> writes:
>>
>>> * gnu/packages/golang.scm (go-1.4): Add missing modules to
>>>   %modify-phases call: srfi-1
>>> ---
>>>  gnu/packages/golang.scm | 3 ++-
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/golang.scm b/gnu/packages/golang.scm
>>> index 00630ce06..d19aa65af 100644
>>> --- a/gnu/packages/golang.scm
>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/golang.scm
>>> @@ -62,7 +62,8 @@
>>>      (arguments
>>>       `(#:modules ((ice-9 match)
>>>                    (guix build gnu-build-system)
>>> -                  (guix build utils))
>>> +                  (guix build utils)
>>> +                  (srfi srfi-1))
>>>         #:tests? #f ; Tests are run by the all.bash script.
>>>         #:phases
>>>         (modify-phases %standard-phases
>>
>> */me looks at git log and facepalms*
>>
>> Never mind my other email... I see that the reason these are already on
>> master is because they were already pushed there. Feel free to close
>> these!
>
> Though as discussed in another thread with Sergei, it’s not entirely
> clear to me that these #:modules patches should be committed (and they
> are for ‘core-updates’, not ‘master’.)
>
> I would rather see whether we can find a more generic solution to this
> problem before patching every single instance.
>
> How does that sound?
>
> Ludo’.

I have no objections. Should the patches already on master be reverted,
or should they be left until further notice?
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 8 years and 14 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.