GNU bug report logs -
#26795
gnu: emacs-ag: Propagate the-silver-searcher.
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 26795 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 26795 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26795
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 06 May 2017 09:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 06 May 2017 09:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
emacs-ag is mostly unusable via Tramp (except if the
'the-silver-searcher' store element is also in the remote system, which
will never happen if the remote system is not running Guix).
I believe 'the-silver-searcher' should be propagated, and the executable
should be 'ag' (which is the default value) instead of
'/gnu/store/...-the-silver-searcher-1.0.2/bin/ag', so that it can be
found on remote systems.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26795
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 06 May 2017 09:08:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 26795 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
This allows emacs-ag to be used on remote systems.
* gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-ag)[inputs]: Remove. Move THE-SILVER-SEARCHER
to...
[propagated-inputs]: ... here.
[arguments]: Remove 'patch-exec-paths' phase.
---
gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
index 74f0ff8b5..3ba5fe102 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
@@ -1125,13 +1125,6 @@ than @code{electric-indent-mode}.")
(arguments
`(#:phases
(modify-phases %standard-phases
- (add-before 'install 'patch-exec-paths
- (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys)
- (emacs-substitute-variables "ag.el"
- ("ag-executable"
- (string-append (assoc-ref inputs "the-silver-searcher")
- "/bin/ag")))
- #t))
(add-before 'install 'make-info
(lambda _
(with-directory-excursion "docs"
@@ -1142,14 +1135,13 @@ than @code{electric-indent-mode}.")
(info (string-append out "/share/info")))
(install-file "docs/_build/texinfo/agel.info" info)
#t))))))
- (inputs
- `(("the-silver-searcher" ,the-silver-searcher)))
(native-inputs
`(("python-sphinx" ,python-sphinx)
("texinfo" ,texinfo)))
(propagated-inputs
`(("dash" ,emacs-dash)
- ("s" ,emacs-s)))
+ ("s" ,emacs-s)
+ ("the-silver-searcher" ,the-silver-searcher)))
(home-page "https://github.com/Wilfred/ag.el")
(synopsis "Front-end for ag (the-silver-searcher) for Emacs")
(description "This package provides the ability to use the silver
--
2.12.2
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26795
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 06 May 2017 14:06:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 26795 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello Clément,
Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> skribis:
> emacs-ag is mostly unusable via Tramp (except if the
> 'the-silver-searcher' store element is also in the remote system, which
> will never happen if the remote system is not running Guix).
>
> I believe 'the-silver-searcher' should be propagated, and the executable
> should be 'ag' (which is the default value) instead of
> '/gnu/store/...-the-silver-searcher-1.0.2/bin/ag', so that it can be
> found on remote systems.
That makes sense to me. Christopher Baines wrote it; WDYT Chris?
> This allows emacs-ag to be used on remote systems.
>
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-ag)[inputs]: Remove. Move THE-SILVER-SEARCHER
> to...
> [propagated-inputs]: ... here.
> [arguments]: Remove 'patch-exec-paths' phase.
[...]
> (propagated-inputs
> `(("dash" ,emacs-dash)
> - ("s" ,emacs-s)))
> + ("s" ,emacs-s)
> + ("the-silver-searcher" ,the-silver-searcher)))
I’d suggest writing the rationale for propagation in a comment above.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26795
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 11 May 2017 16:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 26795 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Clément & Ludo,
I also ran into the same issue. With Ludo's comment below addressed,
it's ok for me !
> I’d suggest writing the rationale for propagation in a comment above.
Thanks,
Mathieu
Reply sent
to
Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 12 May 2017 08:43:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 12 May 2017 08:43:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 26795-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Clément & Ludo,
>
> I also ran into the same issue. With Ludo's comment below addressed,
> it's ok for me !
>
>> I’d suggest writing the rationale for propagation in a comment above.
Ok I pushed then, with the comment. Thanks for the review :-)
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 09 Jun 2017 11:24:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 98 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.