GNU bug report logs - #26702
[PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add font-cns11643

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Alex Kost <alezost <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#26702: closed ([PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add font-cns11643)
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 20:13:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 04 May 2017 23:12:00 +0300
with message-id <87h910crfz.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#26702: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add font-cns11643
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #26702,
regarding [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add font-cns11643
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
26702: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26702
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Brendan Tildesley <brendan.tildesley <at> openmailbox.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add font-cns11643
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 04:53:13 +1000

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

[0001-gnu-Add-font-cns11643.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Alex Kost <alezost <at> gmail.com>
To: Brendan Tildesley <brendan.tildesley <at> openmailbox.org>
Cc: 26702-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26702: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add font-cns11643
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 23:12:00 +0300

Brendan Tildesley (2017-05-02 00:43 +1000) wrote:

> Marius Bakke 於 2017-05-01 01:10 寫道:
[...]
>>> +    (outputs '("out" "tw-kai" "tw-sung"))
>>> +    (build-system trivial-build-system)
>>> +    (native-inputs
>>> +     `(("unzip" ,unzip)))
>>> +    (arguments
>>> +     `(#:modules ((guix build utils))
>>> +       #:builder
>>> +       (begin
>>> +         (use-modules (guix build utils))
>>> +         (let* ((font-dir "/share/fonts/truetype/cns11643")
>>> +                (out (string-append %output font-dir))
>> I've changes this to use (assoc-ref outputs "out") instead of the
>> magical %output.
> Ok, I don't understand much about those. Are the uses of %outputs (with
> the 's') below also problematic?

No they are OK, moreover this is the only way to access the outputs.

-- 
Alex

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.