GNU bug report logs - #26635
25.1; elisp docs bug

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: "zhangjg" <jinguozhang <at> qq.com>
To: "Andreas Schwab" <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>
Cc: 26635 <26635 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: bug#26635: 回复： bug#26635: 25.1; elisp docs bug
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:31:17 +0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Like the fellow code:

  (= 1 1 t) ; error
  (= 1 2 t) ; nil

t is a symbol, (= 1 1 t) signal a error, that is what we expect. 
But in the second form there is no error, because  "=" get the
result before to eval the third argument "t". 
So "=" not to eval all arguments, that is  a "sepecial form" activation.




------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "Andreas Schwab";<schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>;
发送时间: 2017年4月24日(星期一) 下午5:59
收件人: "zhangjg"<jinguozhang <at> qq.com>; 
抄送: "26635"<26635 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; 
主题: Re: bug#26635: 25.1; elisp docs bug



On Apr 24 2017, "zhangjg" <jinguozhang <at> qq.com> wrote:

> In session "3.4 Comparison of Numbers", "=" is a set to a "function" but, in fact it a "special forms".

Why do you think `=' is a special form?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.