GNU bug report logs - #26604
documentation: pdf generation is broken

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#26604: closed (documentation: pdf generation is broken)
Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 15:18:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sun, 23 May 2021 17:17:26 +0200
with message-id <878s45qy2h.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#26604: documentation: pdf generation is broken
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #26604,
regarding documentation: pdf generation is broken
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
26604: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26604
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: ng0 <contact.ng0 <at> cryptolab.net>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: documentation: pdf generation is broken
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:09:47 +0000

As long as I run guix I was never able to build the documentation
as pdf. What's wrong with it?

[user <at> abyayala ~/src/guix/guix]$ make doc/guix.pdf
  TEXI2PDF doc/guix.pdf
  /gnu/store/jz7jq4w8d4czvgnk9as07rrdbcfjjgjj-profile/bin/texi2dvi: pdftex exited with bad status, quitting.
  make: *** [Makefile:3591: doc/guix.pdf] Error 1

-- 
PGP and more: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: 26604-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26604: documentation: pdf generation is broken
Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 17:17:26 +0200

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skriver:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 12:04, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> wrote:
>
>> At least the first “wizard stuff” is merely a list of packages.
>> There isn’t anything we can do to avoid the selection of packages,
>> because that stuff is modular by design.  We could have an
>> arbitrary collection of Texlive packages, but I’m sure we can’t
>> agree on any good set because what exactly is needed depends on
>> the document.
>
> [...]
>
>> If the problem is in figuring out what Texlive packages to install
>> for generating the Guix manual: we can either document that or add
>> the required packages to the inputs.
>
> I agree.  Maybe via a manifest file?
>
>> If you still get errors relating to fonts or font maps: this has
>> been fixed on the “master” branch; the texlive-configuration
>> profile hook didn’t update the font maps.
>
> Cool!  I have missed.
>
> Well, let close this old bug. \o/

Agreed, closing!

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.