GNU bug report logs -
#26380
Adding 'summary' and 'outlook' fields from upstream debbugs?
Previous Next
Full log
Message #41 received at 26380 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com> writes:
Hi Noam,
>> There are some bugs (*) I could work on; using your repo
>> would be much safer than changing directly on debbugs.gnu.org, as I did
>> in the past.
>
> Ah, I tagged Glenn as the author of all the reconstructed commits, does
> that mean some of them should be yours?
Yes, some very few changes are from me. Some other changes are from
Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>, IIRC. But since the vast majority
of the changes are from Glenn, I have no problems all (reconstructed)
commits are dedicated to him.
The major change I have contributed is the extension of the SOAP
interface by function search_est, see your commit 4bec5ac. I've offered
the Debian guys to take over; no reaction.
>> Furthermore, do we intend to offer Debian to take over changes we have
>> applied? I've tried that in the past, but the Debian people didn't
>> react. Years ago, but we could retry.
>
> Well, first we'd have to see if our changes would make sense. I've seen
> a couple of cases so far during the merge where it looks like the same
> bug was fixed on the Debian side.
Yes.
And there was also something else outside the debbugs package, we have
reported to Debian (and which is said fixed now). See
<https://bugs.debian.org/734470>, don't know whether the Debian patch
has arrived debbugs.gnu.org.
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 360 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.