GNU bug report logs - #26379
patch for display.texi

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Tak Kunihiro <tkk <at> misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp>

Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 23:38:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 26379 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 26379 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#26379; Package emacs. (Wed, 05 Apr 2017 23:38:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Tak Kunihiro <tkk <at> misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 05 Apr 2017 23:38:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tak Kunihiro <tkk <at> misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Cc: Kunihiro Tak <tkk <at> misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp>
Subject: patch for display.texi
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:05 +0900
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
My entry point is Info and sometime I think Info needs to be updated.
For example, I could not notice existence of line-pixel-height for a long time.
So having it in Info is very useful.  Thus I want to send a patch for display.texi
to infer line-pixel-height.

However, at the same time, I wonder if sending this kind of patch is really useful.

[display.texi.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

Reply sent to Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:43:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Tak Kunihiro <tkk <at> misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:43:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 26379-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Tak Kunihiro <tkk <at> misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp>
Cc: 26379-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26379: patch for display.texi
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:42:44 +0300
> From: Tak Kunihiro <tkk <at> misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp>
> Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:05 +0900
> Cc: Kunihiro Tak <tkk <at> misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp>
> 
> My entry point is Info and sometime I think Info needs to be updated.
> For example, I could not notice existence of line-pixel-height for a long time.
> So having it in Info is very useful.  Thus I want to send a patch for display.texi
> to infer line-pixel-height.

Thanks, I used a slightly different wording and added it in a
different node.  Pushed to the emacs-25 branch.

> However, at the same time, I wonder if sending this kind of patch is really useful.

Why not?




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#26379; Package emacs. (Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:22:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 26379-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tak Kunihiro <tkk <at> misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp>
To: eliz <at> gnu.org
Cc: tkk <at> misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp, 26379-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26379: patch for display.texi
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:20:43 +0900 (JST)
>> However, at the same time, I wonder if sending this kind of patch
>> is really useful.
> 
> Why not?

Writing documentation is not that appreciated in my daily
circumstance.  Thus I was not sure the revision of a few lines is
regarded as `useful'.  Now I know!




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 10 May 2017 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 8 years and 36 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.