GNU bug report logs - #26378
26.0.50; Hitting 'n' during ediff gives Error

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 20:58:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed

Merged with 26385, 26394

Found in version 26.0.50

Done: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #34 received at 26378 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
To: Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi <at> gmail.com>
Cc: phst <at> google.com, 26378 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26378: 26.0.50; Hitting 'n' during ediff gives Error
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 19:38:26 -0400
Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi <at> gmail.com> writes:

>> > +The PROGRAM is executed asynchronously unless `system-type' is
>> > +`windows-nt' or `ms-dos', or unless SYNCH is non-nil.
>>
>> I think the second "unless" is redundant.
>>
>
> I prefer repeating 'unless' in this case where the subject is changing from
> system-type to SYNCH. It just adds clarity. Though, grammatically what you
> suggested is also correct. So for reducing redundancy, I'll go with your
> suggestion.

Yeah, I guess it could go either way.

>
>> > I have tweaked this part slightly (see patch in this email). Based on the
>> > code, nil and "" elements will be removed from a concatenated list of
>> > OPTIONS and FILES; not just FILES.
>>
>> But OPTIONS can't have nil or "" in it (or any "elements", really), so I
>> don't think there is any need to talk about that in the docstring.
>>
>
> That's correct. I've updated the patch with what you suggested earlier.

Thanks, I think this is ready to go in.  Could you resend as an
attachment?  It doesn't seem to apply, possibly because of line wrapping
and/or whitespace corruption.




This bug report was last modified 8 years and 40 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.