GNU bug report logs -
#26013
(srfi srfi-37) chokes on empty string parameter
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 26013 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 26013 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26013
; Package
guile
.
(Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:36:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:36:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello Guilers,
It looks like Guile's srfi-37 implementation doesn't process empty
string arguments correctly. For example, here's a stacktrace I get
when executing guix system list-generations "":
$ guix system list-generations ""
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
160: 15 [catch #t #<catch-closure 188c1c0> ...]
In unknown file:
?: 14 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 188c1c0>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
66: 13 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
432: 12 [eval # #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
2404: 11 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 18af900 at
ice-9/boot-9.scm:4051:3 ()>]
4056: 10 [#<procedure 18af900 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4051:3 ()>]
1727: 9 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
1732: 8 [#<procedure 18c3b70 ()>]
In unknown file:
?: 7 [primitive-load
"/gnu/store/hnbqdmfh1bwma8nmpai6ci76h5j6bl7j-guix-0.12.0-4.d9da/bin/.guix-real"]
In guix/ui.scm:
1228: 6 [run-guix-command system "list-generations" ""]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
160: 5 [catch srfi-34 #<procedure 47e1580 at guix/ui.scm:432:2 ()>
...]
160: 4 [catch system-error ...]
In guix/scripts/system.scm:
947: 3 [#<procedure 47e2b10 at guix/scripts/system.scm:946:2 ()>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
160: 2 [catch misc-error #<procedure 47e4c00 at
guix/scripts.scm:48:4 ()> ...]
In srfi/srfi-37.scm:
220: 1 [next-arg]
In unknown file:
?: 0 [string-ref "" 0]
ERROR: In procedure string-ref:
ERROR: Value out of range: 0
cheers,
Thomas
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26013
; Package
guile
.
(Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 26013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Tue 07 Mar 2017 16:34, Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be> writes:
> It looks like Guile's srfi-37 implementation doesn't process empty
> string arguments correctly. For example, here's a stacktrace I get when
> executing guix system list-generations "":
>
> $ guix system list-generations ""
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 160: 15 [catch #t #<catch-closure 188c1c0> ...]
> In unknown file:
> ?: 14 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 188c1c0>]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 66: 13 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
> 432: 12 [eval # #]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 2404: 11 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 18af900 at
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:4051:3 ()>]
> 4056: 10 [#<procedure 18af900 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4051:3 ()>]
> 1727: 9 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
> 1732: 8 [#<procedure 18c3b70 ()>]
> In unknown file:
> ?: 7 [primitive-load
> "/gnu/store/hnbqdmfh1bwma8nmpai6ci76h5j6bl7j-guix-0.12.0-4.d9da/bin/.guix-real"]
> In guix/ui.scm:
> 1228: 6 [run-guix-command system "list-generations" ""]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 160: 5 [catch srfi-34 #<procedure 47e1580 at guix/ui.scm:432:2 ()> ...]
> 160: 4 [catch system-error ...]
> In guix/scripts/system.scm:
> 947: 3 [#<procedure 47e2b10 at guix/scripts/system.scm:946:2 ()>]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 160: 2 [catch misc-error #<procedure 47e4c00 at guix/scripts.scm:48:4
> ()> ...]
> In srfi/srfi-37.scm:
> 220: 1 [next-arg]
> In unknown file:
> ?: 0 [string-ref "" 0]
>
> ERROR: In procedure string-ref:
> ERROR: Value out of range: 0
Sounds like the right diagnosis to me. Want to submit a patch? :)
Andy
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26013
; Package
guile
.
(Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:33:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 26013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> igalia.com>
Subject: Re: bug#26013: (srfi srfi-37) chokes on empty string
parameter
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:13:25 +0200
> On Tue 07 Mar 2017 16:34, Thomas Danckaert
> <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be> writes:
>
>> It looks like Guile's srfi-37 implementation doesn't process empty
>> string arguments correctly.
>> [...]
>> In srfi/srfi-37.scm:
>> 220: 1 [next-arg]
>> In unknown file:
>> ?: 0 [string-ref "" 0]
>>
>> ERROR: In procedure string-ref:
>> ERROR: Value out of range: 0
>
> Sounds like the right diagnosis to me. Want to submit a patch? :)
Well, let me try :)
I don't fully understand the code in srfi-37.scm, but I think the fix
can be as simple as the attached patch (i.e. first check if the
argument is empty, otherwise check if it starts with \#-).
I have tried to follow the existing indentation convention, as far as
I understand it (a mix of tabs and spaces).
Thomas
[0001-SRFI-37-Account-for-zero-length-arguments.patch (text/x-patch, inline)]
From bd0bd95e3786211effe728bae61ef5b02f6cc5f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Danckaert <thomas.danckaert <at> gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:14:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] SRFI-37: Account for zero-length arguments.
* module/srfi/srfi-37.scm (args-fold): When checking if an argument is
an option (starts with #\-), first check if the length is non-zero.
---
module/srfi/srfi-37.scm | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/module/srfi/srfi-37.scm b/module/srfi/srfi-37.scm
index 3f654af2c..c34b0d083 100644
--- a/module/srfi/srfi-37.scm
+++ b/module/srfi/srfi-37.scm
@@ -217,7 +217,8 @@ program-arguments in ARGS, as decided by the OPTIONS'
(if (null? args)
(apply values seeds)
(let ((arg (car args)))
- (cond ((or (not (char=? #\- (string-ref arg 0)))
+ (cond ((or (string-null? arg)
+ (not (char=? #\- (string-ref arg 0)))
(= 1 (string-length arg))) ;"-"
(mutate-seeds! operand-proc arg)
(set! args (cdr args)))
--
2.12.2
Reply sent
to
Andy Wingo <wingo <at> igalia.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:00:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 26013-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Wed 19 Apr 2017 18:32, Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be> writes:
>> On Tue 07 Mar 2017 16:34, Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be>
>> writes:
>>
>>> It looks like Guile's srfi-37 implementation doesn't process empty
>>> string arguments correctly.
> I don't fully understand the code in srfi-37.scm, but I think the fix
> can be as simple as the attached patch (i.e. first check if the argument
> is empty, otherwise check if it starts with \#-).
Applied, thanks :)
Andy
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 18 May 2017 11:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 126 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.