GNU bug report logs - #26008
‘guix offload test’ provides insufficient details upon failure

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:02:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#26008: closed (‘guix offload
 test’ provides insufficient details upon failure)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 14:12:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jan 2018 15:11:15 +0100
with message-id <87a7xhonlo.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#26008: ‘guix offload test’ provides insufficient details upon failure
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #26008,
regarding ‘guix offload test’ provides insufficient details upon failure
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
26008: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26008
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: ‘guix offload test’
 provides insufficient details upon failure
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 12:01:11 +0100
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
See message below.

[Message part 4 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Myles English <mylesenglish <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: help-guix <help-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: guix offload, (test returned #<unspecified>)
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 23:23:01 +0000
Hi Ludo',

on [2017-03-06] at 10:52 Ludovic Courtès writes:

> Myles English <mylesenglish <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Two hosts, setup the same as far as I can see, behave differently when
>> trying to offload builds, any idea how I can get more information on
>> what the #<unspecified> might indicate?  Looking at
>> guix/scripts/offload.scm:551 suggests the result is not a string.
>>
>> $ guix offload test
>> guix offload: testing 2 build machines defined in '/etc/guix/machines.scm'...
>> guix offload: 'host1.mydomain.co.uk' is running guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.13
>> guix offload: 'host2.mydomain.co.uk' is running guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.13
>> guix offload: Guix is usable on 'host1.mydomain.co.uk' (test returned "/gnu/store/883yjkl46dxw9mzykykmbs0yzwyxm17z-test")
>> guix offload: error: failed to use Guix module on 'host2.mydomain.co.uk'
>> (test returned #<unspecified>)
>
> What you see here most likely means that host2 threw an exception while
> executing this code:
>
>   http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/guix/scripts/offload.scm#n543
>
> The reason could be:
>
>   1. That the (guix …) modules could not be found in the search path
>      (your tests suggest this is not the case);
>
>   2. That an exception was thrown, for instance because the ‘with-store’
>      form failed to connect to the daemon on that machine (is the daemon
>      running on that machine? Is it listening on
>      /var/guix/daemon-socket/socket and not some other place?).

Yes, that was probably the problem.  I have since updated the host
systems, rebooted, restarted the daemons and now it works, thanks.

> We should definitely improve that and provide details about the
> exception, at least.

Yes, I agree, because 'guix offload test' should provide useful details
when it fails and not just when it succeeds.

Myles
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: 26008-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26008: ‘guix offload test’ provides insufficient details upon failure
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 15:11:15 +0100
Hi,

ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:

> on [2017-03-06] at 10:52 Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Myles English <mylesenglish <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> Two hosts, setup the same as far as I can see, behave differently when
>>> trying to offload builds, any idea how I can get more information on
>>> what the #<unspecified> might indicate?  Looking at
>>> guix/scripts/offload.scm:551 suggests the result is not a string.
>>>
>>> $ guix offload test
>>> guix offload: testing 2 build machines defined in '/etc/guix/machines.scm'...
>>> guix offload: 'host1.mydomain.co.uk' is running guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.13
>>> guix offload: 'host2.mydomain.co.uk' is running guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.13
>>> guix offload: Guix is usable on 'host1.mydomain.co.uk' (test returned "/gnu/store/883yjkl46dxw9mzykykmbs0yzwyxm17z-test")
>>> guix offload: error: failed to use Guix module on 'host2.mydomain.co.uk'
>>> (test returned #<unspecified>)
>>
>> What you see here most likely means that host2 threw an exception while
>> executing this code:
>>
>>   http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/guix/scripts/offload.scm#n543
>>
>> The reason could be:
>>
>>   1. That the (guix …) modules could not be found in the search path
>>      (your tests suggest this is not the case);
>>
>>   2. That an exception was thrown, for instance because the ‘with-store’
>>      form failed to connect to the daemon on that machine (is the daemon
>>      running on that machine? Is it listening on
>>      /var/guix/daemon-socket/socket and not some other place?).
>
> Yes, that was probably the problem.  I have since updated the host
> systems, rebooted, restarted the daemons and now it works, thanks.
>
>> We should definitely improve that and provide details about the
>> exception, at least.
>
> Yes, I agree, because 'guix offload test' should provide useful details
> when it fails and not just when it succeeds.

Commit 4eb0f9ae05a9bf20fb91c49b39bebc687265c5e5 improves that.

Ludo’.


This bug report was last modified 7 years and 223 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.