GNU bug report logs - #25724
sed (bug or wrong command ?)

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: Enrico Magrì <enrico_magri <at> hotmail.com>, Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com>
Cc: "25724 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <25724 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: bug#25724: R: bug#25724: sed (bug or wrong command ?)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:57:48 -0600

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

[top-posting is frowned on within technical lists]

On 02/16/2017 04:37 PM, Enrico Magrì wrote:
> Hi Gordon,
> thanks for the information; ok I'll try in this way. Do you know the http link where I can download the updated sed.exe for windows ?
> Currently I founded only this link for windows OS: http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/
> but I believe that it's not the updated package.

The cygwin project [https://cygwin.com] has an up-to-date sed 4.4
available for windows
[https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2017-02/msg00020.html]
<bias>
and a maintainer that's more responsive than the unxutils folks (seeing
as how that maintainer is me, and I read this list :)
</bias>

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.