GNU bug report logs - #25205
Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 25205 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 25205 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:32:48 -0500

Steps to reproduce
==================

1. Go to https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/g.html
2. Locate a guix package, and click on the "Expand" button


Unexpected behavior
===================

The description shows the logotype of the Guix System Distribution.


Expected behavior
=================

The description shows the logotype of the Guix package manager.


Additional information
======================

Source files for Guix and GuixSD logos are available in the artwork 
repository (see https://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=guix).


-- 
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/

Message #8 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
Cc: 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:27:23 +0100

Hello Felipe!

Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:

> Steps to reproduce
> ==================
>
> 1. Go to https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/g.html
> 2. Locate a guix package, and click on the "Expand" button
>
>
> Unexpected behavior
> ===================
>
> The description shows the logotype of the Guix System Distribution.

The list of GNU package logos is maintained separately, in the “GNU
womb” project at <https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/womb>.  So in
general such reports should go to bug-womb <at> gnu.org.

However, I would argue that the original Guix logotype is mostly
superseded by the other one.  I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s
confusion to have two logos, and that the GuixSD one is cute anyway.
:-)

WDYT?

Thanks!

Ludo’.

Message #11 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber <at> dustycloud.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>,
 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:47:40 -0600

Ludovic Courtès writes:

> Hello Felipe!
>
> Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:
>
>> Steps to reproduce
>> ==================
>>
>> 1. Go to https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/g.html
>> 2. Locate a guix package, and click on the "Expand" button
>>
>>
>> Unexpected behavior
>> ===================
>>
>> The description shows the logotype of the Guix System Distribution.
>
> The list of GNU package logos is maintained separately, in the “GNU
> womb” project at <https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/womb>.  So in
> general such reports should go to bug-womb <at> gnu.org.
>
> However, I would argue that the original Guix logotype is mostly
> superseded by the other one.  I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s
> confusion to have two logos, and that the GuixSD one is cute anyway.
> :-)
>
> WDYT?

I strongly support this.

Message #14 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>,
 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 22:12:58 +0100

Hi,

ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:
>
>> Steps to reproduce
>> ==================
>>
>> 1. Go to https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/g.html
>> 2. Locate a guix package, and click on the "Expand" button
>>
>>
>> Unexpected behavior
>> ===================
>>
>> The description shows the logotype of the Guix System Distribution.
>
> The list of GNU package logos is maintained separately, in the “GNU
> womb” project at <https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/womb>.  So in
> general such reports should go to bug-womb <at> gnu.org.
>
> However, I would argue that the original Guix logotype is mostly
> superseded by the other one.  I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s
> confusion to have two logos, and that the GuixSD one is cute anyway.
> :-)

As long as Guix and GuixSD are not synonymous, I would argue that mixing
the two logos increases confusion, whether it looks pretty or not.
Especially since the logos include their name.

If the choice of using GuixSD logo when designing Guix is about
esthetics, maybe we could use the same symbol for both logos.  Maybe
with a slightly different color that would help distinguish them?

What do people think?

-- 
Mathieu Lirzin

Message #17 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
To: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>,
 Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 23:00:52 -0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> However, I would argue that the original Guix logotype is mostly
>> superseded by the other one.  I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s
>> confusion to have two logos, and that the GuixSD one is cute anyway.
>> :-)
>
> As long as Guix and GuixSD are not synonymous, I would argue that mixing
> the two logos increases confusion, whether it looks pretty or not.
> Especially since the logos include their name.
>
>
> What do people think?

Please understand that this is just my own opinion.

I think branding matters.  And I think using one icon for the "Guix" and
"GuixSD" logos is better branding than two very different-looking icons.
Having two icons does not make the difference clearer.  If anything, I
feel that it is MORE confusing because it fails to emphasize the common
component: Guix.

Consider Nix.  They use only one icon [1] on the websites for Nix [2]
and NixOS [3].  When you see it, you know the brand is Nix.  Nix and
NixOS are closely related to one another, so it's natural to share the
icon.  What's the difference?  A logo won't tell you; you need to read
the manual to learn that.  But you know it's Nix, regardless of how it's
being used.

I think GNU Guix should use one logo to strengthen its branding.  The
golden GNU [4] is better than the other one [5], so that's what I'd use.

> If the choice of using GuixSD logo when designing Guix is about
> esthetics, maybe we could use the same symbol for both logos.  Maybe
> with a slightly different color that would help distinguish them?

Since the words "Guix" and "GuixSD" are already different, I don't think
they need to come in a different color.  I do like the off-color "SD" in
the "GuixSD" logo, though, since it emphasizes that it's still Guix.

[1] https://nixos.org/logo/nixos-logo-only-hires.png
[2] https://nixos.org/nix/
[3] https://nixos.org/
[4] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/plain/logo/GuixSD.svg
[5] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/plain/logo/guix-logo.svg

-- 
Chris

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>
To: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>,
 Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:48:15 +0100

Hi Chris,

Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> However, I would argue that the original Guix logotype is mostly
>>> superseded by the other one.  I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s
>>> confusion to have two logos, and that the GuixSD one is cute anyway.
>>> :-)
>>
>> As long as Guix and GuixSD are not synonymous, I would argue that mixing
>> the two logos increases confusion, whether it looks pretty or not.
>> Especially since the logos include their name.
>>
>>
>> What do people think?
>
> Please understand that this is just my own opinion.
>
> I think branding matters.  And I think using one icon for the "Guix" and
> "GuixSD" logos is better branding than two very different-looking icons.
> Having two icons does not make the difference clearer.  If anything, I
> feel that it is MORE confusing because it fails to emphasize the common
> component: Guix.

I would not say that having different icons is confusing, however I
agree that having one icon can help to visually see how they relate to
each other.

> Consider Nix.  They use only one icon [1] on the websites for Nix [2]
> and NixOS [3].  When you see it, you know the brand is Nix.  Nix and
> NixOS are closely related to one another, so it's natural to share the
> icon.  What's the difference?  A logo won't tell you; you need to read
> the manual to learn that.  But you know it's Nix, regardless of how it's
> being used.
>
> I think GNU Guix should use one logo to strengthen its branding.  The
> golden GNU [4] is better than the other one [5], so that's what I'd use.
>
>> If the choice of using GuixSD logo when designing Guix is about
>> esthetics, maybe we could use the same symbol for both logos.  Maybe
>> with a slightly different color that would help distinguish them?
>
> Since the words "Guix" and "GuixSD" are already different, I don't think
> they need to come in a different color.  I do like the off-color "SD" in
> the "GuixSD" logo, though, since it emphasizes that it's still Guix.

That would definetely match what the Nix project is doing.  While IMO
Nix is not necessarily a model to follow, this would definitely be
better than what is currently done for Guix/GuixSD "branding".

Thanks,

-- 
Mathieu Lirzin

Message #23 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>,
 Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>, 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:28:40 +0100

Hi!

Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> Since the words "Guix" and "GuixSD" are already different, I don't think
> they need to come in a different color.  I do like the off-color "SD" in
> the "GuixSD" logo, though, since it emphasizes that it's still Guix.

Right.  I thought that having “SD” in light gray kind of makes the logo
usable for both Guix{,SD}.

(And I agree with the branding argument.)

I’d like to know what Felipe thinks of this since he’s the expert.  :-)

Cheers,
Ludo’.

Message #26 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
To: ludo <at> gnu.org
Cc: 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>,
 Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:56:37 -0500

On 2016-12-16 05:28, ludo <at> gnu.org wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> 
>> Since the words "Guix" and "GuixSD" are already different, I don't 
>> think
>> they need to come in a different color.  I do like the off-color "SD" 
>> in
>> the "GuixSD" logo, though, since it emphasizes that it's still Guix.
> 
> Right.  I thought that having “SD” in light gray kind of makes the logo
> usable for both Guix{,SD}.
> 
> (And I agree with the branding argument.)
> 
> I’d like to know what Felipe thinks of this since he’s the expert.  :-)


Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as well. 
I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, but 
not the same text. For example:

~v~ Guix
~v~ GuixSD

If this is OK, then I think we should:

- Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo.
- Send a copy to GNU womb for update.
- Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/
- Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/
- Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/

I can do the above, so yes? :)


-- 
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/

Message #29 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus <at> mdc-berlin.de>
To: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
Cc: 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ludo <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 17:08:28 +0100

Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> writes:

> Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as well. 
> I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, but 
> not the same text. For example:
>
> ~v~ Guix
> ~v~ GuixSD
>
> If this is OK, then I think we should:
>
> - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo.
> - Send a copy to GNU womb for update.
> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/
> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/
> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/
>
> I can do the above, so yes? :)

This sounds good.  Thank you!

~~ Ricardo

Message #32 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus <at> mdc-berlin.de>
Cc: 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ludo <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 16:37:43 -0500

On 2016-12-16 11:08, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> writes:
> 
>> Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as 
>> well.
>> I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, 
>> but
>> not the same text. For example:
>> 
>> ~v~ Guix
>> ~v~ GuixSD
>> 
>> If this is OK, then I think we should:
>> 
>> - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo.
>> - Send a copy to GNU womb for update.
>> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/
>> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/
>> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/
>> 
>> I can do the above, so yes? :)
> 
> This sounds good.  Thank you!


Ok, I made the changes in the artwork repository, which will be visible 
for users in the next deployment of the website.

Next, I'll contact GNU womb to update the logo over there.


-- 
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/

Message #35 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus <at> mdc-berlin.de>
Cc: 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ludo <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 09:45:47 -0500

Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> writes:
> 
> Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as well.
> I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, but
> not the same text. For example:
> 
> ~v~ Guix
> ~v~ GuixSD
> 
> If this is OK, then I think we should:
> 
> - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo.
> - Send a copy to GNU womb for update.
> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/
> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/
> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/

These tasks are done, and changes are online now.

The updated Guix logo in the package list should be visible once GNU 
womb links to the new image 
(https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-womb/2016-12/msg00001.html).


-- 
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/

Message #38 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>
To: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
Cc: 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus <at> mdc-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:09:22 +0100

Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> writes:

> Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> writes:
>>
>> Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as well.
>> I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, but
>> not the same text. For example:
>>
>> ~v~ Guix
>> ~v~ GuixSD
>>
>> If this is OK, then I think we should:
>>
>> - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo.
>> - Send a copy to GNU womb for update.
>> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/
>> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/
>> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/
>
> These tasks are done, and changes are online now.
>
> The updated Guix logo in the package list should be visible once GNU
> womb links to the new image
> (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-womb/2016-12/msg00001.html).

Thanks!  Amazing work as always.  :)

-- 
Mathieu Lirzin
GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761  070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37

Message #41 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
Cc: 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus <at> mdc-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 19:49:51 +0100

Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:

> Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> writes:
>>
>> Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as well.
>> I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, but
>> not the same text. For example:
>>
>> ~v~ Guix
>> ~v~ GuixSD
>>
>> If this is OK, then I think we should:
>>
>> - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo.
>> - Send a copy to GNU womb for update.
>> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/
>> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/
>> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/
>
> These tasks are done, and changes are online now.
>
> The updated Guix logo in the package list should be visible once GNU
> womb links to the new image
> (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-womb/2016-12/msg00001.html).

Great, thank you!

Ludo’.

Message #44 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
To: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
Cc: 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus <at> mdc-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:05:29 -0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> writes:

> Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> writes:
>>
>> Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as well.
>> I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, but
>> not the same text. For example:
>>
>> ~v~ Guix
>> ~v~ GuixSD
>>
>> If this is OK, then I think we should:
>>
>> - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo.
>> - Send a copy to GNU womb for update.
>> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/
>> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/
>> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/
>
> These tasks are done, and changes are online now.
>
> The updated Guix logo in the package list should be visible once GNU
> womb links to the new image
> (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-womb/2016-12/msg00001.html).

Looks great!  Does the guix-artwork repository contain the "horizontal"
version that is currently published on the website?  I couldn't find it.

I've also noticed that the Wikipedia article is still using the other
logo.  I attempted to update it, but because I don't have an account, I
wasn't able to replace the SVG file with the new one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guix

I don't suppose someone on this thread can fix the Wikipedia article?
If not, I'll try again once the 10-day "autoconfirm" period of
restricted access for new Wikipedia accounts passes.

FWIW, there also appears to be a copy of the logo in Wikimedia commons:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Guix-logo.svg

I tried to update this one, too, but the Wikimedia uploader rejected the
SVG files as "corrupt".

-- 
Chris

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #47 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
To: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus <at> mdc-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:14:51 -0500

On 2016-12-17 16:05, Chris Marusich wrote:

[...]

> Looks great!  Does the guix-artwork repository contain the "horizontal"
> version that is currently published on the website?  I couldn't find 
> it.


Yes, the SVG file for each logo has variants (horizontal, light, dark, 
etc.). In Inkscape, you can select a variant and export it.


> I've also noticed that the Wikipedia article is still using the other
> logo.  I attempted to update it, but because I don't have an account, I
> wasn't able to replace the SVG file with the new one.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guix
> 
> I don't suppose someone on this thread can fix the Wikipedia article?
> If not, I'll try again once the 10-day "autoconfirm" period of
> restricted access for new Wikipedia accounts passes.


I have an account and could update Guix article, but I won't have time 
until next Thursday (maybe).


> FWIW, there also appears to be a copy of the logo in Wikimedia commons:
> 
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Guix-logo.svg
> 
> I tried to update this one, too, but the Wikimedia uploader rejected 
> the
> SVG files as "corrupt".


The current SVGs from the artwork repository were rejected as corrupt?


-- 
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/

Message #52 received at 25205-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
To: 25205-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:42:14 -0500

GNU womb updated the image.

This bug is fixed.

-- 
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/

Message #55 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Guix Wikipedia page logo updated
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:49:40 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Guix,

[First debbugs post, let's hope this works.]

I've updated the Guix Wikipedia page to use the new ‘unified’ logo.

Since Wikimedia rejects our SVG, I had to resort to copy-pasting the
original image in Inkscape and saving it as a new file.

It wasn't pretty, but the new logo sure is.

Kind regards,

T G-R

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #58 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the
 Guix logo
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:30:31 +0100

Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org> skribis:

> GNU womb updated the image.

Thanks for taking care of this!

Ludo’.

Message #61 received at 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 25205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix Wikipedia page logo updated
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:42:39 +0100

Hi!

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> skribis:

> [First debbugs post, let's hope this works.]

It does!  :-)

> I've updated the Guix Wikipedia page to use the new ‘unified’ logo.

Great, thank you!

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.