GNU bug report logs -
#24693
Small doc improvement of start-process
Previous Next
Reported by: Hong Xu <hong <at> topbug.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:17:01 UTC
Severity: minor
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #8 received at 24693 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Okt 14 2016, Hong Xu <hong <at> topbug.net> wrote:
> PROGARM-ARGS are not mentioned in the docstring. The attached patch is a
> draft of the small improvement. Thanks!
>
> diff --git a/lisp/subr.el b/lisp/subr.el
> index 8a1792ad8b78..c3524ef1fccb 100644
> --- a/lisp/subr.el
> +++ b/lisp/subr.el
> @@ -2001,6 +2001,9 @@ PROGRAM is the program file name. It is searched for in `exec-path'
> \(which see). If nil, just associate a pty with the buffer. Remaining
> arguments are strings to give program as arguments.
>
> +PROGRAM-ARGS are strings that specify command line arguments for the
> +subprocess.
> +
That's what it says in the preceding sentence.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 253 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.