GNU bug report logs -
#24693
Small doc improvement of start-process
Previous Next
Reported by: Hong Xu <hong <at> topbug.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:17:01 UTC
Severity: minor
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 24693 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 24693 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24693
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Hong Xu <hong <at> topbug.net>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
PROGARM-ARGS are not mentioned in the docstring. The attached patch is a
draft of the small improvement. Thanks!
[doc-improvement.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24693
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 24693 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Okt 14 2016, Hong Xu <hong <at> topbug.net> wrote:
> PROGARM-ARGS are not mentioned in the docstring. The attached patch is a
> draft of the small improvement. Thanks!
>
> diff --git a/lisp/subr.el b/lisp/subr.el
> index 8a1792ad8b78..c3524ef1fccb 100644
> --- a/lisp/subr.el
> +++ b/lisp/subr.el
> @@ -2001,6 +2001,9 @@ PROGRAM is the program file name. It is searched for in `exec-path'
> \(which see). If nil, just associate a pty with the buffer. Remaining
> arguments are strings to give program as arguments.
>
> +PROGRAM-ARGS are strings that specify command line arguments for the
> +subprocess.
> +
That's what it says in the preceding sentence.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24693
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:40:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 24693 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 10/14/2016 11:25 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Okt 14 2016, Hong Xu <hong <at> topbug.net> wrote:
>
>> PROGARM-ARGS are not mentioned in the docstring. The attached patch is a
>> draft of the small improvement. Thanks!
>>
>> diff --git a/lisp/subr.el b/lisp/subr.el
>> index 8a1792ad8b78..c3524ef1fccb 100644
>> --- a/lisp/subr.el
>> +++ b/lisp/subr.el
>> @@ -2001,6 +2001,9 @@ PROGRAM is the program file name. It is searched for in `exec-path'
>> \(which see). If nil, just associate a pty with the buffer. Remaining
>> arguments are strings to give program as arguments.
>>
>> +PROGRAM-ARGS are strings that specify command line arguments for the
>> +subprocess.
>> +
>
> That's what it says in the preceding sentence.
>
I see. Maybe mention PROGRAM-ARGS explicitly like: Remaining
arguments PROGRAM-ARGS are strings to give program as arguments.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24693
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:07:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 24693 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 10/14/2016 11:39 AM, Hong Xu wrote:
>
> I see. Maybe mention PROGRAM-ARGS explicitly like: Remaining
> arguments PROGRAM-ARGS are strings to give program as arguments.
>
>
Can we push the small fix? This is a tiny fix but it certainly improves
the quality of the doc.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Reply sent
to
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 18 Oct 2016 06:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Hong Xu <hong <at> topbug.net>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 18 Oct 2016 06:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 24693-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Hong Xu <hong <at> topbug.net>
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:06:01 -0700
>
> On 10/14/2016 11:39 AM, Hong Xu wrote:
> >
> > I see. Maybe mention PROGRAM-ARGS explicitly like: Remaining
> > arguments PROGRAM-ARGS are strings to give program as arguments.
> >
>
> Can we push the small fix? This is a tiny fix but it certainly improves
> the quality of the doc.
Done.
Thanks.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 220 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.