GNU bug report logs -
#24572
[gnu.org #1151531] Emacs Manual Page missing?
Previous Next
Reported by: webmasters-comment <at> gnu.org
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:08:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Merged with 24552,
24568
Found in version 25.1
Done: Nicolas Petton <nicolas <at> petton.fr>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 24572 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 24572 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24572
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:08:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
webmasters-comment <at> gnu.org
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:08:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello Emacs maintainers,
Here is another bug report against the manual.
Best regards,
Therese
> [nknight <at> siaras.com - Ven. Sep. 30 00:42:20 2016]:
>
> Section 10.9 of the Emacs manual (on "Lax Search") seems to be missing
> as
> of Thu Sep 29 21:40:28 PDT 2016.
>
> I retrieved it from the following URL at about Tue Sep 27 17:48:16
> 2016 PDT:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Lax-
> Search.html#Lax-Search
>
> Thanks,
> -NK
>
>
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24572
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 30 Sep 2016 09:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 24572 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 04:06:53 -0400
> Cc: 24572 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Hello Emacs maintainers,
>
> Here is another bug report against the manual.
>
> > [nknight <at> siaras.com - Ven. Sep. 30 00:42:20 2016]:
> >
> > Section 10.9 of the Emacs manual (on "Lax Search") seems to be missing
> > as
> > of Thu Sep 29 21:40:28 PDT 2016.
> >
> > I retrieved it from the following URL at about Tue Sep 27 17:48:16
> > 2016 PDT:
> >
> > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Lax-
> > Search.html#Lax-Search
The node "Lax Search" does exist in the manual, I see it in the Info
formatted manual. So this is some problem with how the manual was
generated and/or uploaded to www.gnu.org/software/. So it's not a bug
in Emacs.
(The section number is 15.9, not 10.9; I assume that was a typo in the
original report.)
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24572
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 30 Sep 2016 09:23:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 24572 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 05:00:28AM -0400, eliz via RT wrote:
> >
> > > [nknight <at> siaras.com - Ven. Sep. 30 00:42:20 2016]:
> > >
> > > Section 10.9 of the Emacs manual (on "Lax Search") seems to be missing
> > > as
> > > of Thu Sep 29 21:40:28 PDT 2016.
> > >
> > > I retrieved it from the following URL at about Tue Sep 27 17:48:16
> > > 2016 PDT:
> > >
> > > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Lax-
> > > Search.html#Lax-Search
>
> The node "Lax Search" does exist in the manual, I see it in the Info
> formatted manual. So this is some problem with how the manual was
> generated and/or uploaded to www.gnu.org/software/.
I guess it's a new file that hasn't been added to CVS.
> So it's not a bug in Emacs.
No, unless Emacs was used to commit the manual as whole.
Thank you!
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24572
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 03 Oct 2016 12:14:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 24572 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Ineiev <ineiev <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> The node "Lax Search" does exist in the manual, I see it in the Info
>> formatted manual. So this is some problem with how the manual was
>> generated and/or uploaded to www.gnu.org/software/.
>
> I guess it's a new file that hasn't been added to CVS.
Indeed, this one and some other pages were missing. I added them to the
repository, and I'm closing this issue.
Nico
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent
to
Nicolas Petton <nicolas <at> petton.fr>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Mon, 03 Oct 2016 12:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
webmasters-comment <at> gnu.org
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Mon, 03 Oct 2016 12:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Forcibly Merged 24552 24568 24572.
Request was from
npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:19:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 02 Nov 2016 11:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 288 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.