GNU bug report logs - #23787
[PATCH] * lisp/bindings.el: create binding for ‘cycle-spacing’

Previous Next

Full log

Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86 <at> mina86.com>
Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org, dak <at> gnu.org, rms <at> gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org,
 bojohan <at> gnu.org, tsdh <at> gnu.org, acm <at> muc.de, tlikonen <at> iki.fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH] * lisp/bindings.el: create binding for
 ‘cycle-spacing’
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:22:34 +0300

> From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86 <at> mina86.com>
> Cc: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>,
> 	Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>,
> 	Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
> 	David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org>,
> 	Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>,
> 	Teemu Likonen <tlikonen <at> iki.fi>,
> 	Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>,
> 	Johan Bockgård <bojohan <at> gnu.org>
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:12:16 +0200
> 
> ‘cycle-spacing’ behaves like ‘just-one-space’ when invoked once so
> binding it to M-SPC should not be (very) destructive to users.
> 
> When this change has been propesed back in 2014¹, the main concern
> was that back then the function behaved a bit differently from the
> old one in certain situations.  This has since been changed by a
> [687e0e1: “Make ‘cycle-spacing’ behave more like ‘just-one-space’
> if colled once.”] commit.

That's not the only concern that was brought up back then.  It was
suggested to poll users.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.