GNU bug report logs - #22596
25.1.50; Broken prompt-regexp for sql-postgres

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Steve <steve <at> sanityinc.com>

Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 07:43:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed, patch

Found in version 25.1.50

Fixed in version 26.1

Done: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Steve Purcell <steve <at> sanityinc.com>
Cc: 22596 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#22596: Acknowledgement (25.1.50; Broken prompt-regexp for sql-postgres)
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:02:09 +1100
Steve Purcell <steve <at> sanityinc.com> writes:

> Fixes issue 22596, whereby "_" is now not considered a word constituent
> character in sql-interactive-mode, so prompts like "foo_dev# " are not
> correctly detected. Rather than piggy-back on the symbol table, we
> explicitly match against alphanumeric chars or "_".
>
> In the general case, almost any characters are valid in a PostgreSQL
> database name, so we must choose between matching .reasonable. database
> names with a tight regexp, or matching all allowable names with a
> permissive regexp which would likely match all sorts of other buffer
> text. This commit follows the former approach.

[...]

> -     :prompt-regexp "^\\w*=[#>] "
> +     :prompt-regexp "^[[:alnum:]_]*=[#>] "
>       :prompt-length 5
> -     :prompt-cont-regexp "^\\w*[-(][#>] "
> +     :prompt-cont-regexp "^[[:alnum:]_]*[-(][#>] "

This looks reasonable to me, but I'm not an SQL mode user, so I can't
really test it.  Does anybody have an objection to this change?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




This bug report was last modified 8 years and 174 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.