GNU bug report logs - #21886
24.5; `dired-next/previous-line' should have a "^" in their interactive specs

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 21886 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 21886 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Barzilay <eli <at> barzilay.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.5;
 `dired-next/previous-line' should have a "^" in their interactive
 specs
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 03:14:15 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

If I bind the up/down arrow keys to `dired-next/previous-line' in
dired mode, they misbehave wrt shift selection.  The following simple
patch fixes this by adding a "^" to their `interactive' declarations.

[0001-Add-to-the-interactive-specs-of-dired-next-previous-.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

-- 
                    ((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x)))                   Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

Message #10 received at 21886-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Barzilay <eli <at> barzilay.org>
Cc: 21886-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21886: 24.5; `dired-next/previous-line' should have a "^" in
 their interactive specs
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:39:19 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Thanks, committed as 851be0f60718795c985f504db4823344508b107d

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #13 received at 21886-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Barzilay <eli <at> barzilay.org>
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 21886-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21886: 24.5; `dired-next/previous-line' should have a "^" in
 their interactive specs
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 03:51:10 -0500

Does it sound sensible to add the same to `dired-next-dirline' and
`dired-prev-dirline'?  (If so, I can do the push.)

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, committed as 851be0f60718795c985f504db4823344508b107d

-- 
                    ((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x)))                   Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

Message #16 received at 21886-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Barzilay <eli <at> barzilay.org>
Cc: 21886-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21886: 24.5; `dired-next/previous-line' should have a "^" in
 their interactive specs
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:44:43 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli <at> barzilay.org> wrote:

> Does it sound sensible to add the same to `dired-next-dirline' and
> `dired-prev-dirline'?

Well, I think it is as sensible as adding it to
dired-(next|previous)-line...

> (If so, I can do the push.)

Yep, I know. Sorry.

If you do, please write the commit log in a more "ChangeLog"ish style (I
mean, add the file name, etc.). TIA.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.