GNU bug report logs -
#21307
25.0.50; "Warning (:warning): : `lexical-binding' at end of file unreliable" not helpful
Previous Next
Reported by: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:09:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Merged with 17518,
21681
Found in versions 24.4.50, 25.0.50
Fixed in version 25.0.91
Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 21307 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 21307 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21307
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:09:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:09:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
At some point I noticed a window *Warnings* with this wonderful message, in a *Warnings* buffer:
*Warnings*
Warning (:warning): : `lexical-binding' at end of file unreliable
What the context for that is, I have no idea. Dunno when it was
displayed or what file it is talking about. But hey, thanks for the
warning. ;-)
Please, if you write a message about a file, *MENTION THE FILE BY NAME*.
Especially for a supposed *WARNING*.
And preferably refer somehow to the operation that led to the warning.
What was being done to the mysterious file - what function, what
context, what time... Give us some clue what your gratuitous "warning"
is about, please. Or alternatively, just drop such noise altogether.
Oh, and you might want to also rethink this part of the noise:
"Warning (:warning): : ". Maybe you'd like to add a few more "warning"s
or spaces or colons, for emphasis? Or if such seemingly repetitive
parts are in fact significant, maybe you could point out just what
they mean?
IOW, either improve the incomprehensible message or drop it altogether,
please.
In GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32)
of 2015-07-31 on LEG570
Bzr revision: 8d332aeccab2208e6c6bd434738565e6abf12043
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
Configured using:
`configure --host=i686-pc-mingw32 --enable-checking=yes,glyphs'
Forcibly Merged 17518 21307.
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:03:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Forcibly Merged 17518 21307 21681.
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:56:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug marked as fixed in version 25.0.91, send any further explanations to
21681 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 03 Feb 2016 18:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 9 years and 111 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.