GNU bug report logs - #20941
Fwd: installation of automake, autoconf, m4 error

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:27:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>
To: Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com>
Cc: m4-discuss <at> gnu.org, automake-discuss <at> gnu.org, m4-announce <at> gnu.org, bug-autoconf <at> gnu.org, autoconf-discuss <at> gnu.org, autoconf-announce <at> gnu.org, bug-m4 <at> gnu.org, automake-announce <at> gnu.org, 20941 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#20941: Fwd: installation of automake, autoconf, m4 error
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 18:46:08 +0200
Hello,

Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com> writes:

> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:40 AM
> Subject: installation of automake, autoconf, m4 error
> To: <gnu <at> gnu.org>, <bug-m4 <at> gnu.org>
>
> Hello GNU,
>
> I have been trying to install automake, autoconf, and m4 on my NetBSD-4.0.1-x68k system. As I understand from your website, automake requires autoconf which requires m4 which requires perl. I havent
> installed perl yet, because I am getting errors saying that it cant make built-in (still trying to find a way around this).
>
> However, the problem I had with m4 make was not with perl, it said that automake-1.14 was missing from the system. This does not make sense since that would mean that there would be a cycle in the
> dependency tree.
>
> I am trying to install the latest version of autoconf (2012 release), the latest version of m4 (2013 release), and the second latest verison of automake (2013 release).
>
> Can you please tell me what I am doing wrong? Is your software even compatible with a NetBSD-4.0.1-x68k system?

When building a package from a tarball, Unless something fishy happened
in the distribution process, Automake should not be required.  Maybe you
were trying to build m4 from the git repository?  I have successfully
built m4-1.4.18 tarball on my system without requiring Automake.

Thanks for the bug report.

-- 
Mathieu Lirzin
GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761  070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 311 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.