GNU bug report logs - #20941
Fwd: installation of automake, autoconf, m4 error

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:27:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 20941 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 20941 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#20941; Package automake. (Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:27:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-automake <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:27:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com>
To: m4-announce <at> gnu.org, m4-discuss <at> gnu.org, automake-announce <at> gnu.org, 
 bug-automake <at> gnu.org, autoconf-announce <at> gnu.org, autoconf-discuss <at> gnu.org, 
 automake-discuss <at> gnu.org, bug-autoconf <at> gnu.org, 
 "bug-m4 <at> gnu.org" <bug-m4 <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Fwd: installation of automake, autoconf, m4 error
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:37:23 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:40 AM
Subject: installation of automake, autoconf, m4 error
To: <gnu <at> gnu.org>, <bug-m4 <at> gnu.org>


Hello GNU,

I have been trying to install automake, autoconf, and m4 on my
NetBSD-4.0.1-x68k system. As I understand from your website, automake
requires autoconf which requires m4 which requires perl. I havent installed
perl yet, because I am getting errors saying that it cant make built-in
(still trying to find a way around this).

However, the problem I had with m4 make was not with perl, it said that
automake-1.14 was missing from the system. This does not make sense since
that would mean that there would be a cycle in the dependency tree.

I am trying to install the latest version of autoconf (2012 release), the
latest version of m4 (2013 release), and the second latest verison of
automake (2013 release).

Can you please tell me what I am doing wrong? Is your software even
compatible with a NetBSD-4.0.1-x68k system?

Thanks,
Krishnan Rajiyah
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#20941; Package automake. (Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:47:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 20941 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>
To: Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com>
Cc: m4-discuss <at> gnu.org, automake-discuss <at> gnu.org, m4-announce <at> gnu.org,
 bug-autoconf <at> gnu.org, autoconf-discuss <at> gnu.org, autoconf-announce <at> gnu.org,
 bug-m4 <at> gnu.org, automake-announce <at> gnu.org, 20941 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20941: Fwd: installation of automake, autoconf, m4 error
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 18:46:08 +0200
Hello,

Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com> writes:

> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:40 AM
> Subject: installation of automake, autoconf, m4 error
> To: <gnu <at> gnu.org>, <bug-m4 <at> gnu.org>
>
> Hello GNU,
>
> I have been trying to install automake, autoconf, and m4 on my NetBSD-4.0.1-x68k system. As I understand from your website, automake requires autoconf which requires m4 which requires perl. I havent
> installed perl yet, because I am getting errors saying that it cant make built-in (still trying to find a way around this).
>
> However, the problem I had with m4 make was not with perl, it said that automake-1.14 was missing from the system. This does not make sense since that would mean that there would be a cycle in the
> dependency tree.
>
> I am trying to install the latest version of autoconf (2012 release), the latest version of m4 (2013 release), and the second latest verison of automake (2013 release).
>
> Can you please tell me what I am doing wrong? Is your software even compatible with a NetBSD-4.0.1-x68k system?

When building a package from a tarball, Unless something fishy happened
in the distribution process, Automake should not be required.  Maybe you
were trying to build m4 from the git repository?  I have successfully
built m4-1.4.18 tarball on my system without requiring Automake.

Thanks for the bug report.

-- 
Mathieu Lirzin
GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761  070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37




Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#20941; Package automake. (Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:51:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 20941 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>
To: Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 20941 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20941: Fwd: installation of automake, autoconf, m4 error
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 18:50:15 +0200
Please avoid cross posting across mailing lists.

Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com> writes:

> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:40 AM
> Subject: installation of automake, autoconf, m4 error
> To: <gnu <at> gnu.org>, <bug-m4 <at> gnu.org>
>
> Hello GNU,
>
> I have been trying to install automake, autoconf, and m4 on my NetBSD-4.0.1-x68k system. As I understand from your website, automake requires autoconf which requires m4 which requires perl. I havent
> installed perl yet, because I am getting errors saying that it cant make built-in (still trying to find a way around this).
>
> However, the problem I had with m4 make was not with perl, it said that automake-1.14 was missing from the system. This does not make sense since that would mean that there would be a cycle in the
> dependency tree.
>
> I am trying to install the latest version of autoconf (2012 release), the latest version of m4 (2013 release), and the second latest verison of automake (2013 release).
>
> Can you please tell me what I am doing wrong? Is your software even compatible with a NetBSD-4.0.1-x68k system?
>
> Thanks,
> Krishnan Rajiyah

Since in any case this is not related to an automake bug.  I closing
this issue.

Thanks.

-- 
Mathieu Lirzin
GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761  070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37




Added tag(s) notabug. Request was from Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:51:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug closed, send any further explanations to 20941 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com> Request was from Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:51:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#20941; Package automake. (Sun, 16 Jul 2017 19:40:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #18 received at 20941 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>
To: Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 20941 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20941: Fwd: installation of automake, autoconf, m4 error
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 21:39:04 +0200
Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Please avoid cross posting across mailing lists.
>
> Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Krishnan Rajiyah <krajiyah <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:40 AM
>> Subject: installation of automake, autoconf, m4 error
>> To: <gnu <at> gnu.org>, <bug-m4 <at> gnu.org>
>>
>> Hello GNU,
>>
>> I have been trying to install automake, autoconf, and m4 on my
>> NetBSD-4.0.1-x68k system. As I understand from your website,
>> automake requires autoconf which requires m4 which requires perl. I
>> havent
>> installed perl yet, because I am getting errors saying that it cant make built-in (still trying to find a way around this).
>>
>> However, the problem I had with m4 make was not with perl, it said
>> that automake-1.14 was missing from the system. This does not make
>> sense since that would mean that there would be a cycle in the
>> dependency tree.
>>
>> I am trying to install the latest version of autoconf (2012 release), the latest version of m4 (2013 release), and the second latest verison of automake (2013 release).
>>
>> Can you please tell me what I am doing wrong? Is your software even compatible with a NetBSD-4.0.1-x68k system?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Krishnan Rajiyah
>
> Since in any case this is not related to an automake bug.  I closing
> this issue.

I may have been too quick in my conclusion that this is not an automake
bug.  This may be related to bug#20831 [1]

Can you confirm that you were actually building from a tarball ?
If yes then I will reopen this bug and merge it with bug#20831.

Are you able to reproduce this issue with the latest versions of
Autoconf, Automake, and m4 ?

Thanks.

-- 
Mathieu Lirzin
GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761  070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37

[1] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20831




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 7 years and 311 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.