GNU bug report logs - #2074
23.0.60; Rmail summary does not work

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: jpff <jpff <at> codemist.co.uk>

Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:20:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 2069

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 2074 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 2074 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>:
bug#2074; Package emacs. (Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:20:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to jpff <jpff <at> codemist.co.uk>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>. (Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:20:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: jpff <jpff <at> codemist.co.uk>
To: emacs-pretest-bug <at> gnu.org
Subject: 23.0.60; Rmail summary does not work
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:15:46 +0000
Load an RMAIL file, type h
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (search-failed ",,")
  search-forward(",,")
  rmail-make-summary-line-1(1)
  rmail-make-summary-line(1)
  ad-Orig-rmail-new-summary("All" (rmail-summary) nil)
  apply(ad-Orig-rmail-new-summary "All" (rmail-summary) nil nil)
  (setq ad-return-value (apply (quote ad-Orig-rmail-new-summary) description redo-form function args))
  (let ((trace-level ...) (trace-buffer ...)) (unless inhibit-trace (with-current-buffer trace-buffer ... ... ... ... ...)) (setq ad-return-value (apply ... description redo-form function args)) (unless inhibit-trace (with-current-buffer trace-buffer ... ... ...)))
  (let (ad-return-value) (let (... ...) (unless inhibit-trace ...) (setq ad-return-value ...) (unless inhibit-trace ...)) ad-return-value)
  rmail-new-summary("All" (rmail-summary) nil)
  ad-Orig-rmail-summary()
  (setq ad-return-value (ad-Orig-rmail-summary))
  (let ((trace-level ...) (trace-buffer ...)) (unless inhibit-trace (with-current-buffer trace-buffer ... ... ... ... ...)) (setq ad-return-value (ad-Orig-rmail-summary)) (unless inhibit-trace (with-current-buffer trace-buffer ... ... ...)))
  (let (ad-return-value) (let (... ...) (unless inhibit-trace ...) (setq ad-return-value ...) (unless inhibit-trace ...)) ad-return-value)
  rmail-summary()
  call-interactively(rmail-summary nil nil)

Basically it is looking for BABYL format headers which have been
removed.


ALSO

in previous versions of rmail mode the labels were displayed in the
line at the bottom of the window after the mode name, and current
message and number of messages.  There is no such label display now.


In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.14 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.0)
 of 2009-01-26 on cardew
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.70200000
Important settings:
  value of $LC_ALL: nil
  value of $LC_COLLATE: nil
  value of $LC_CTYPE: nil
  value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil
  value of $LC_MONETARY: nil
  value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil
  value of $LC_TIME: nil
  value of $LANG: en_GB.UTF-8
  value of $XMODIFIERS: @im=local
  locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix
  default-enable-multibyte-characters: t

Major mode: Debugger

Minor modes in effect:
  auto-image-file-mode: t
  show-paren-mode: t
  display-time-mode: t
  tooltip-mode: t
  mouse-wheel-mode: t
  menu-bar-mode: t
  file-name-shadow-mode: t
  global-font-lock-mode: t
  font-lock-mode: t
  global-auto-composition-mode: t
  auto-composition-mode: t
  auto-encryption-mode: t
  auto-compression-mode: t
  line-number-mode: t
  transient-mark-mode: (only . t)

Recent input:
<backspace> , a <tab> <backspace> <backspace> , <backspace> 
m a <tab> 2 2 <tab> l i <tab> s <tab> / m a <tab> i 
<tab> <return> C-v <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> 
<down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> 
<down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> 
<down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> 
<down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> 
<down> <down> <return> C-v C-v C-s , , <backspace> 
C-a C-v C-v <escape> M C-x k <return> <escape> < C-s 
r m a i l - s C-w C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s 
C-s C-s C-s <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> 
<help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> 
<help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> 
<help-echo> <menu-bar> <emacs-lisp> <tracing> <tr-f> 
r m a i l - s u m m a r y <return> <return> <down-mouse-1> 
<mouse-movement> <mouse-1> C-s C-w C-w C-w C-s C-s 
C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-a <down> <down> <down> <down> 
<help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> 
<help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> 
<help-echo> <help-echo> <menu-bar> <emacs-lisp> <tracing> 
<tr-f> <down-mouse-1> <mouse-movement> <mouse-movement> 
<drag-mouse-1> <help-echo> <down-mouse-2> <mouse-2> 
<return> <return> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> 
<down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> 
<down> <down> <down> <down> <up> <up> <up> <up> <up> 
<up> <up> <up> <up> <up> <up> <up> <up> <up> <down> 
<down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> 
C-v <help-echo> <down-mouse-1> <mouse-movement> <mouse-movement> 
<drag-mouse-1> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> 
<help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> 
<help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <menu-bar> 
<emacs-lisp> <tracing> <tr-f> <help-echo> <down-mouse-2> 
<mouse-2> <return> <return> <help-echo> C-g C-x b J 
<tab> <return> h <down> <right> <right> <right> <return> 
<down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> 
<down> <down> <down> <down> <help-echo> <down-mouse-1> 
<mouse-movement> <mouse-movement> <help-echo> <mouse-movement> 
<mouse-movement> <mouse-movement> <mouse-movement> 
<mouse-movement> <mouse-movement> <mouse-movement> 
<drag-mouse-1> M-m C-x k <return> M-x r e p o <tab> 
r <tab> <return>

Recent messages:
Loading dired-add...done
Loading vc-cvs...done
Mark saved where search started
Parsing /home/jpff/.mailrc... done
Mark set
Mark saved where search started [2 times]
Quit
Computing summary lines...
Entering debugger...
Making completion list...

==John ffitch




bug reassigned from package `emacs' to `emacs,rmail'. Request was from Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com> to control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:20:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com:
bug#2074; Package emacs,rmail. (Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:45:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 2074 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: John ffitch <jpff <at> codemist.co.uk>
Cc: 2074 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Rmail summary does not work
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:37:11 -0500
John ffitch wrote (on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 at 07:15 +0000):

> Load an RMAIL file, type h
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (search-failed ",,")

This appears to be a problem with your own code, not with rmail.
Obviously, you will have to update your code for the new rmail mbox code.

>   search-forward(",,")
>   rmail-make-summary-line-1(1)

There is no such function in rmail any more.

>   rmail-make-summary-line(1)

There is no such function in rmail any more.

>   ad-Orig-rmail-new-summary("All" (rmail-summary) nil)

You have advised this function.




Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com:
bug#2074; Package emacs,rmail. (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:30:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to jpff <jpff <at> codemist.co.uk>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:30:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 2074 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: jpff <jpff <at> codemist.co.uk>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 2074 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Rmail summary does not work
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:25:15 +0000
Thank you -- I found I had copied rmailsum.el when my mail file went
over 10000 messages and the summary could not cope.
  However it still does not do what the previous summary did -- it
does not display labels in {} as previously. I also note that rmail
mode no longer displays labels on the bottom line.
  I cannot see how to continue; not every machine I use has the
rmail-mbox format and this makes moving form home to work will be next
to impossible, and without working labels I cannot handle mail

Version of 2008-06-07 with -q reading mail
        http://codemist.co.uk/jpff/old-junky.jpg

Version of 2009-01-27 with -q reading mail
        http://codemist.co.uk/jpff/new-junky.jpg

This is the same file, loaded and h typed.  You will see labels in teh
first and not in the second

==John ffitch




Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com:
bug#2074; Package emacs,rmail. (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:45:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #18 received at 2074 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: jpff <jpff <at> codemist.co.uk>
Cc: 2074 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Rmail summary does not work
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:36:40 -0500
merge 2074 2069
stop

jpff wrote:

>   However it still does not do what the previous summary did -- it
> does not display labels in {} as previously. I also note that rmail
> mode no longer displays labels on the bottom line.

Yes, I'm afraid the label handling is rather broken at present, as
reported in bug#2069.

You may wish to use an older version until trunk rmail settles down.




Merged 2069 2074. Request was from Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> to control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:45:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com:
bug#2074; Package emacs,rmail. (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:05:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to rms <at> gnu.org:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:05:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #25 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Richard M Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>
To: jpff <jpff <at> codemist.co.uk>, 2074 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org, bug-submit-list <at> donarmstrong.com,
        2074 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org,
        owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
Subject: Re: bug#2074: 23.0.60; Rmail summary does not work
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:58:14 -0500
      However it still does not do what the previous summary did -- it
    does not display labels in {} as previously. I also note that rmail
    mode no longer displays labels on the bottom line.

When I type `a foobar RET', `foobar' appears in the mode line.
It works also if I move away to another message and move back,
and if I save the file and visit it again.





Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com:
bug#2074; Package emacs,rmail. (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:05:10 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to rms <at> gnu.org:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:05:10 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com:
bug#2074; Package emacs,rmail. (Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:25:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #33 received at 2074 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: rms <at> gnu.org
Cc: jpff <jpff <at> codemist.co.uk>, 2074 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#2074: 23.0.60; Rmail summary does not work
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:16:28 -0500
Richard M Stallman wrote:

> When I type `a foobar RET', `foobar' appears in the mode line.
> It works also if I move away to another message and move back,
> and if I save the file and visit it again.

But the display of labels in the relevant line in the summary buffer,
{ likethis }, seems broken.




Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com:
bug#2074; Package emacs,rmail. (Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:00:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #36 received at 2074 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 2074 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: rms <at> gnu.org, jpff <jpff <at> codemist.co.uk>
Subject: Re: bug#2074: 23.0.60; Rmail summary does not work
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:49:35 -0500
Glenn Morris wrote:

> But the display of labels in the relevant line in the summary buffer,
> { likethis }, seems broken.

Should be fixed now.




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 16 years and 196 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.