GNU bug report logs - #20735
"unable to fork" on armhf

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 20735 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 20735 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: "unable to fork" on armhf
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 22:20:31 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I have an armhf marsboard that I'm trying to run guix on top of debian. I
started by flashing a debian wheezy image, stripping out most of the
packages, and upgrading to jessie. I installed using the 0.8.2 armhf binary.
`guix pull` failed with the error "unable to fork: Invalid argument", and
likewise `guix build hello` also failed. I've included strace logs.

I ran `sudo strace -o log /root/.guix-profile/bin/guix-daemon
--build-users-group=guix-builder &`  and `strace -o hello guix build hello`
and I've attached both of them to the email.

uname -a:
Linux marsboard 3.0.36+ #67 SMP PREEMPT Sat Dec 13 10:01:50 HKT 2014 armv7l
GNU/Linux

ldd --version:
ldd (Debian GLIBC 2.19-18) 2.19

cat /proc/cpuinfo:
Processor	: ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l)
processor	: 0
BogoMIPS	: 503.83

processor	: 1
BogoMIPS	: 503.83

Features	: swp falf thumb fastmult vfp edsp neon vfpv3
CPU implementer	: 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant	: 0x3
CPU part	: 0xc09
CPU revision	: 0

Hardware	: RK30board
Revision	: 0000
Serial		: 0000000000000000

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[hello (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[Message part 4 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #10 received at 20735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>, 20757 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 20735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20757: "unable to fork" on armhf
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:33:58 +0200

Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:

> I recompiled the kernel, still getting failed to fork. I'm missing something
> board specific about using the new kernel. I'll figure it out soonish.

Did you have a chance to look further into it?

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Message #13 received at 20735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>, 20757 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 20735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20757: "unable to fork" on armhf
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 22:09:37 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:33:58 +0200
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:

> Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:
> 
> > I recompiled the kernel, still getting failed to fork. I'm missing
> > something board specific about using the new kernel. I'll figure it out
> > soonish.
> 
> Did you have a chance to look further into it?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

Unfortunately I haven't had a chance to look at it more yet. I've been having
trouble with getting the board to accept my kernel for booting, so now I'm
looking at using one of the other images available (ubunutu, suse) and seeing
if they have the required kernel settings enabled. Given the problems I've
been having, when I do get it to work I plan on following their instructions
for getting the board to boot from a thumbdrive/sdcard and using that as a
target for guixsd. The two things I see as potential blockers down that road
is figuring out uboot, and I'll also have to make a separate rockchip.scm
with the 3(?) programs I needed to compile from source to get the video
working correctly.

Currently I'm on vacation for almost another 3 weeks, and I left the arm
board at home, so I can't work on it too much atm.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #16 received at 20735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>, 20757 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 20735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20757: "unable to fork" on armhf
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:31:09 +0200

Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:

> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:52:51 +0300
> Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 09:13:17 -0400
>> Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> wrote:
>> 
>> > Any update on this?  Did you try rebuilding your kernel with the needed
>> > configuration options enabled?
>> > 
>> >     Thanks,
>> >       Mark
>> 
>> I haven't had a chance yet to rebuild my kernel yet, but I hope to tonight
>> 
>
> I recompiled the kernel, still getting failed to fork. I'm missing something
> board specific about using the new kernel. I'll figure it out soonish.

Hi!  Any update?  Or should we close the bug until we have more clues?

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Message #19 received at 20735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>, 20757 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 20735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20757: "unable to fork" on armhf
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 07:17:03 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:31:09 +0200
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:

> Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:
> 
> > On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:52:51 +0300
> > Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 09:13:17 -0400
> >> Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Any update on this?  Did you try rebuilding your kernel with the needed
> >> > configuration options enabled?
> >> > 
> >> >     Thanks,
> >> >       Mark
> >> 
> >> I haven't had a chance yet to rebuild my kernel yet, but I hope to
> >> tonight
> >> 
> >
> > I recompiled the kernel, still getting failed to fork. I'm missing
> > something board specific about using the new kernel. I'll figure it out
> > soonish.
> 
> Hi!  Any update?  Or should we close the bug until we have more clues?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

Lets close it for now. I haven't had anytime to work on it still, and its not
a guix bug that an unrelated kernel didn't have the configuration set the way
we'd like.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #22 received at 20735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>, 20757-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 20735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20757: "unable to fork" on armhf
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:33:03 +0200

Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:

> Lets close it for now. I haven't had anytime to work on it still, and its not
> a guix bug that an unrelated kernel didn't have the configuration set the way
> we'd like.

OK, done.

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.