GNU bug report logs - #2023
23.0.60; rmail-redecode-body is not available

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:35:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 2023 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 2023 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>:
bug#2023; Package emacs. (Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:35:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>. (Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:35:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: emacs-pretest-bug <at> gnu.org
Subject: 23.0.60; rmail-redecode-body is not available
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:28:53 +0200
Please write in English if possible, because the Emacs maintainers
usually do not have translators to read other languages for them.

Your bug report will be posted to the emacs-pretest-bug <at> gnu.org mailing list.

Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug
and the precise symptoms of the bug:

There's no rmail-redecode-body function in the new Rmail (after the
mbox merge).  This command is very important functionality, both for
when Emacs decodes the message incorrectly (e.g., due to absent or bad
MIME headers in the message), and when a multi-part message is decoded
by hand.

If Emacs crashed, and you have the Emacs process in the gdb debugger,
please include the output from the following gdb commands:
    `bt full' and `xbacktrace'.
If you would like to further debug the crash, please read the file
d:/gnu/emacs/etc/DEBUG for instructions.


In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2009-01-24 on HOME-C4E4A596F7
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4)'

Important settings:
  value of $LC_ALL: nil
  value of $LC_COLLATE: nil
  value of $LC_CTYPE: nil
  value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil
  value of $LC_MONETARY: nil
  value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil
  value of $LC_TIME: nil
  value of $LANG: ENU
  value of $XMODIFIERS: nil
  locale-coding-system: cp1255
  default-enable-multibyte-characters: t

Major mode: RMAIL

Minor modes in effect:
  tooltip-mode: t
  tool-bar-mode: t
  mouse-wheel-mode: t
  menu-bar-mode: t
  file-name-shadow-mode: t
  global-font-lock-mode: t
  font-lock-mode: t
  blink-cursor-mode: t
  global-auto-composition-mode: t
  auto-composition-mode: t
  auto-encryption-mode: t
  auto-compression-mode: t
  line-number-mode: t
  transient-mark-mode: t

Recent input:
<return> <return> <up> <up> <up> <up> SPC SPC <down> 
<M-left> SPC SPC <down> <M-left> SPC SPC <down> <down> 
T h e SPC l a s t SPC c o m m a n d SPC a u t o m a 
t i c a l l y SPC s a v e s SPC t h e SPC R m a i l 
SPC i n b o x SPC ( a s SPC i t SPC s h o u l d ) , 
SPC b u t SPC t h e SPC b u f f e r SPC i s SPC m a 
r k e d SPC m o d i f i e d SPC a f t e r SPC s a c 
e <backspace> <backspace> <backspace> <backspace> t 
h e SPC s a v e SPC <backspace> . <C-left> <C-left> 
<C-left> <C-left> <C-left> <C-left> <C-right> SPC n 
e v e r t h e l e s s M-q <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> 
<down-mouse-1> <mouse-1> <help-echo> C-x o <C-home> 
<down> <down> <down> <down> <down> C-SPC <next> <down> 
<down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <next> 
<next> <next> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> 
<down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> <down> 
<down> <down> M-w <down-mouse-1> <drag-mouse-1> <help-echo> 
<C-home> <down> <right> <right> <right> <right> C-SPC 
<down> <left> <left> <left> <left> <left> <down> C-e 
<right> M-w <help-echo> <down-mouse-1> <mouse-1> <help-echo> 
C-x C-x C-x 0 <down> <down> <up> C-SPC <down> M-w C-x 
b m a <tab> <return> M-x r e d e c o d e - b o d y 
<return> C-g C-h f r e d e <backspace> <backspace> 
<backspace> m a i l - r e d e c o d e - b o d y <return> 
<return> C-g M-x <up> <return>

Recent messages:
37 new messages read
Auto-saving...done
Mark set [2 times]
Saved text from "  emacs -Q
  C-u M-x rmail FOO RET
  C-u"
Mark set [2 times]
exchange-point-and-mark: No mark set in this buffer
Mark set
Auto-saving...done
Quit [2 times]




bug reassigned from package `emacs' to `emacs,rmail'. Request was from Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com> to control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:00:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com:
bug#2023; Package emacs,rmail. (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:55:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:55:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #12 received at 2023 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 2023 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 23.0.60; rmail-redecode-body is not available
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:48:00 -0500
I've committed an updated version of rmail-redecode-body.  Could you
check whether it works properly?




Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com:
bug#2023; Package emacs,rmail. (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:20:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>, owner <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:20:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 2023 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
Cc: 2023 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 23.0.60; rmail-redecode-body is not available
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:14:28 +0200
> From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
> Cc: 2023 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:48:00 -0500
> 
> I've committed an updated version of rmail-redecode-body.  Could you
> check whether it works properly?

It seems to work in a few simple tests, but fails badly in others.  I
fixed one obvious problem with it, but the rest are still there.

However, the current state of affairs in the new Rmail regarding
non-ASCII characters is so badly broken that it's impossible to say
which problems are due to rmail-redecode-body and which are caused
elsewhere.

I suggest to leave this bug open until the other bugs related to
encoding/decoding (#2015, #2017, and #2018) are fixed, and then
revisit this one.

Thanks.




Reply sent to Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:05:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:05:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #22 received at 2023-done <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: 2023-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: cyd <at> stupidchicken.com
Subject: Re: bug#2023: 23.0.60; rmail-redecode-body is not available
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:55:26 +0200
> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:14:28 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: 2023 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
> 
> I suggest to leave this bug open until the other bugs related to
> encoding/decoding (#2015, #2017, and #2018) are fixed, and then
> revisit this one.

With bug #2018 fixed, I can now confirm that rmail-redecode-body does
its job correctly.  Thanks.




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 16 years and 173 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.