GNU bug report logs -
#1988
Making the license statement visible in the Emacs Manual
Previous Next
Reported by: Jesse W <jessw <at> netwood.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:25:03 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Whew, that was a lot of files...
On Feb 6, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
> No. Sorry for not specifying. I just mean the manuals in the Emacs
> distribution, namely those here:
> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/emacs/doc/?root=emacs
>
> (There are many individual manuals in the misc/ subdir.)
Oh, /those/ manuals... ;-) OK, here they are.
calc.texi had the copyright date line repeated on the title page, so I
removed the redundant one.
dbus.texi already included @insertcopying, as far back as its initial
revision about a year ago.
erc.texi is the same.
faq.texi isn't under the GFDL, rather it's under a vague copyleft
statement, with copyright dates going back to 1990.
gnus-faq.texi claims to be generated from an XML file, which I can't
find (the given URL breaks, the gnus.org site does not appear to have
the purported XML file visible anywhere..), so I'm leaving that one
aside for now.
gnus-news.texi is also not under GFDL, and has it's copyright statement
in a comment, so we'll leave that one alone, too.
gnus.texi already has @insertcopying.
mh-e.texi is dual-licensed under the GFDL 1.3+ and the GPL 3+, and
already has @insertcopying.
org.texi already has @insertcopying.
remember.texi does too.
smtpmail.texi also.
tramp.texi has @insertcopying at the bottom of the Top node.
trampver.texi isn't exactly a manual, and has it's license statement in
a comment; ignoring.
Quite a few of them repeated a descriptive line in @copying and in the
top of the Top node; I removed the repeats where I saw them.
And that's it... all the others are included in the big-pile-o-patch
attached below.
[emacs_misc_manuals_insertcopying.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
> Dealing with manuals in other distributions has to be done separately,
> through their respective maintainers/bug lists. If you want to take
> that on, that would be great.
OK, I'll see what I can do. Do you have any suggestions about which
projects would be most receptive?
Jesse Weinstein
This bug report was last modified 16 years and 142 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.