GNU bug report logs - #19417
let, assq-set optimization gone wrong?

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Matt Wette <mwette <at> alumni.caltech.edu>

Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:53:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Merged with 19415

Done: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 19417 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 19417 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#19417; Package guile. (Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:53:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Matt Wette <mwette <at> alumni.caltech.edu>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guile <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:53:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matt Wette <mwette <at> alumni.caltech.edu>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Cc: mwette <at> alumni.caltech.edu, Panicz Maciej Godek <godek.maciek <at> gmail.com>
Subject: let, assq-set optimization gone wrong?
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 21:51:29 -0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
This was discovered with help from godek.maciek <at> gmail.com.
It seems the variable "l" in the second let below is bound to the value from the first.
I ran into this bug when using syntax-rules with a let/a-list in the expansion.

mwette$ cat bug.scm
(let ((l '((a . 1) (b . 2)))) (assq-set! l 'b 99))
(let ((l '((a . 1) (b . 2)))) l)
mwette$ guile20
GNU Guile 2.0.11
Copyright (C) 1995-2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'.
This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details.

Enter `,help' for help.
scheme@(guile-user)> (load "bug.scm")
$1 = ((a . 1) (b . 99))

scheme@(guile-user)> %guile-build-info
$2 = ((buildstamp . "2014-10-07 02:36:10") (CFLAGS . " -I/opt/local/include -D_THREAD_SAFE ") (LIBS . "-L/opt/local/lib  -lm ") (libguileinterface . "29:2:7") (guileversion . "2.0.11") (extensiondir . "/opt/local/lib/guile/2.0/extensions") (pkgincludedir . "/opt/local/include/guile") (pkglibdir . "/opt/local/lib/guile") (pkgdatadir . "/opt/local/share/guile") (includedir . "/opt/local/include") (mandir . "/opt/local/share/man") (infodir . "/opt/local/share/info") (ccachedir . "/opt/local/lib/guile/2.0/ccache") (libdir . "/opt/local/lib") (localstatedir . "/opt/local/var") (sharedstatedir . "/opt/local/com") (sysconfdir . "/opt/local/etc") (datadir . "/opt/local/share") (libexecdir . "/opt/local/libexec") (sbindir . "/opt/local/sbin") (bindir . "/opt/local/bin") (exec_prefix . "/opt/local") (prefix . "/opt/local") (top_srcdir . "/opt/local/var/macports/build/_Users_mwette_proj_macports_ports_lang_guile20/guile20/work/guile-2.0.11") (srcdir . "/opt/local/var/macports/build/_Users_mwette_proj_macports_ports_lang_guile20/guile20/work/guile-2.0.11/libguile"))

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#19417; Package guile. (Sat, 20 Dec 2014 14:46:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 19417 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matt Wette <mwette <at> alumni.caltech.edu>
To: 19417 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: oops - may not be a bug
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 06:44:50 -0800
I have been told this has to do with '((a . 1) (b . 1)) being a literal.   I'm guessing guile caches this and it get then mutated.






Information forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#19417; Package guile. (Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:05:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 19417 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
To: Matt Wette <mwette <at> alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: 19417 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, request <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#19417: oops - may not be a bug
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 02:02:44 -0500
tags 19417 + notabug
close 19417
thanks

Matt Wette <mwette <at> alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> I have been told this has to do with '((a . 1) (b . 1)) being a
> literal.  I'm guessing guile caches this and it get then mutated.

Right.  As explained on guile-user, mutating literal data is not
permitted and leads to unspecified behavior.  Our compiler aggressively
shares data between literals in the same compilation unit.

     Mark




Added tag(s) notabug. Request was from Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:05:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug closed, send any further explanations to 19417 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Matt Wette <mwette <at> alumni.caltech.edu> Request was from Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:05:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Merged 19415 19417. Request was from Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:11:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:24:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 10 years and 150 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.