GNU bug report logs - #19178
11.88; 11.88 Xemacs 11.88 problem with env and labels

Previous Next

Package: auctex;

Reported by: Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es>

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:13:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 19199

Found in version 11.88

Done: Mosè Giordano <mose <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #13 received at 19178 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es>
To: 19178 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#19178: closed (Re: bug#19178: 11.88;
 11.88 Xemacs 11.88 problem with env and labels)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:42:02 +0100
   > From: Mosè Giordano <mose <at> gnu.org>
   > Subject: Re: bug#19178: 11.88; 11.88 Xemacs 11.88 problem with env and labels
   > To: 19178-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
   > Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:29:59 +0100 (7 minutes, 22 seconds ago)
   > Message-ID: <CAKtYQqTyPBYLd6RqU+tRMG78GoWzaoMpWg1cb5B-CratFcbGAg <at> mail.gmail.com>

   > Hi Uwe,

   > 2014-11-25 15:11 GMT+01:00 Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es>:

   > This is not a bug: `LaTeX-label' now has two arguments, the label to
   > be inserted and the type, either environment or section, so you have
   > to replace your call to `LaTeX-label' with
   >     (LaTeX-label environment 'environment)

   > Bye,
   > Mosè



Grrr, this breaks backwards[1] compatibility. Couldn't that have been optional?
Not sure whether to wrap the old code in a cond call 

 (if AUCTeX-version blab bla)

Are there other syntax changes? The issue is if I find a real bug and
need  urgently to write something up, I would use 11.87 but now once I
change the syntax I couldn't...

Uwe 




Footnotes:
[1]  or forward compatibility, whatever term you find more appropriate.






This bug report was last modified 10 years and 183 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.