GNU bug report logs - #18752
24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?

Previous Next

Full log

Message #38 received at 18752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
Cc: 18752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, fni-news <at> pirilampo.org, dmoncayo <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#18752: 24.3.94;
 Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 20:46:07 +0300

> Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:35:48 -0400
> From: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
> CC: 18752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, fni-news <at> pirilampo.org
> 
> On 10/18/2014 12:17 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Unoptimized builds make debugging easier, but are about 2 - 2.5 times
> > slower than optimized ones.  For that reason, the usual practice is to
> > produce unoptimized builds for snapshots and pretests, but optimized
> > ones for official releases.
> >
> > Latest GCC versions support a -Og optimization switch that gives you
> > the best of both worlds.
> 
> Do you happen to know how much of a performance difference there typically is 
> between -Og and -O2?

No; measurements welcome.

Personally, I'd be surprised to see more than a few percents of
difference for Emacs.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.