GNU bug report logs - #18752
24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Fabrice Niessen <fni-news <at> pirilampo.org>

Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:07:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: notabug

Found in version 24.3.94

Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
To: Fabrice Niessen <fni-news <at> pirilampo.org>
Cc: 18752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs?
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:11:53 +0200

> Dani, can you build an optimized version as well next time?

I could, yes.  But before, I'd like to understand what are the
advantages and drawbacks of optimized vs unoptimized builds.  Could
someone explain that to me, or tell me where could I read that
information?

Also, what should I do to produce an optimized build?  "nt/INSTALL"
shows an example of how to configure an unoptimized build, but there
is no example for an optimized one.  How about adding that lacking
example to the file?

-- 
Dani Moncayo
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 344 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.