GNU bug report logs - #18656
25.0.50; (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....)

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#18656: closed (25.0.50; (defun temp-buffer-window-show
 (&optional buffer action) ....))
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:42:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:41:35 +0800
with message-id <m3mw94p05c.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#18656: 25.0.50; (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #18656,
regarding 25.0.50; (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
18656: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18656
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 25.0.50;
 (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....)
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:32:24 +0800

BUFFER is actually a required argument. Shouldn't the lambda-list be
written as:

(defun temp-buffer-window-show (buffer &optional action) .....)

Leo

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Cc: 18656-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#18656: 25.0.50;
 (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:41:35 +0800

version: 25.1

On 2014-10-10 11:03 +0200, martin rudalics wrote:
> Yes.  Please do that.
>
> Thanks, martin

Done.

Leo

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.